Re: [urn] LEI namespace registration request

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com> Mon, 20 December 2021 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10CD3A0834 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:54:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.852, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mozilla.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30T3uCX0Sd57 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:54:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3F7D3A0831 for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:54:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id x15so8347535ilc.5 for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:54:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k1rijI6KhJAWvZ1iNw79LeQlMZJuQ7oQu5iw75ee9GU=; b=TvKnTOo3gMlfmXY9X+BK4A7mT/yHY/3SOx79eiaDduwiKrR6vFr63p0l0yhiJwtB7D /u2k8saB4VZ1+Xnjnip7y6rbtgLIpLKiDSK3VwzV4+T7zjZ78Fn0lTa8EjyUObiHI2yj HNu7er2Xr7/HYAX9wSJbfr5jcNgQ3FKVVnoG8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=k1rijI6KhJAWvZ1iNw79LeQlMZJuQ7oQu5iw75ee9GU=; b=QJxBiEgieayJbGERhddRYbDjN1v9U16qBpOD981sm8B9tawaE9lhP5nvjfnqX6difL PVQtaxwAHuIkFhmv39Wp+GBF3eCeOJ8pnE7YIVLISG1Sx/DGdtFRsUHHQ51jOcpnc4ej xCVn3yofSL1GEGWbQXsAMJ1/mJ6KAL0EwDDElRu5mae+OZ/BA4xd7O3DMWZdcP/PaXdC nkBeW8DX2KpRER/Xb+NCyabQw/hBcpWwAyrIiQ+/1r6ZWDwWGuUgK1Awuqh8VuOAeod8 0lpqOBSwT7QZ3/97LnC0P0coJttTYQ+GoULrBU4z81d0+Wv1T4lCV0xQefnCU3mex52w I2zQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5300PwL8cjtUMEQyc+Tt+BqfAX246t0oYRz81xUXZdPNgj1hgCPb ZtqvUFx5Q6/i63tOfB6QoqqgYA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6zL70vknD5WGdfT0eZbUGL/2UwxiHe1gM7HixpvhSMatJP6VJkMXpmu7+YBLNKSq9NC+r/g==
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d387:: with SMTP id o7mr8544000ilo.308.1640026444048; Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:54:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (c-76-25-154-156.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [76.25.154.156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm10594034ild.14.2021.12.20.10.54.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:54:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <ab72bb37-ec29-c41f-7c91-849755cad5e7@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 11:54:02 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.4.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Ivan Marin <Ivan.Marin@Gleif.org>, "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Cc: Christoph Schneider <Christoph.Schneider@Gleif.org>, Karla Mckenna <Karla.Mckenna@Gleif.org>, Clare Rowley <Clare.Rowley@Gleif.org>, "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
References: <522D804F-BC40-4BC2-8CAD-A7A96B1C86B3@gleif.org> <87h7er7th4.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <31CD9E68-CF53-46AD-85A0-16367069EB89@gleif.org> <D68EE112-CCE1-4297-9B18-4D753260DED4@gleif.org> <791297b2-9b25-b52e-bbc9-20947aba125b@mozilla.com> <058AED47-CC26-4E29-91CC-C79480C6ACF3@gleif.org>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com>
In-Reply-To: <058AED47-CC26-4E29-91CC-C79480C6ACF3@gleif.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/6Vs519hgFs6j3LP-Z_W59BLJz7k>
Subject: Re: [urn] LEI namespace registration request
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:54:11 -0000

On 12/20/21 2:01 AM, Ivan Marin wrote:
> Thanks Peter for your comments.
> 
> I have added suggested modifications:
> - amended the title to: "Namespace Identifier:  LEI"
> - urn:LEI:foo is equivalent to urn:lei:foo ... as the "LEI" name is not case sensitive.
> - As is correct, I keep the template titles for easier reference in further reviews.
> 
> Find version 7 attached.
> 
> Following your statement: "Everything else looks fine to me and I can work with IANA to add this NID to the registry."
> We understand that you push it through the IANA registration process.

Yes, this is my responsibility because I am the team lead for the expert 
reviewers.

> Which dates can we expect for its final release or publication?

Although I'm not sure about the end-of-year schedule at IANA, I would 
say we can update the registry in the next few weeks (perhaps sooner).

> Let us know please if further actions are needed on our side at this stage to make it happen.

If you could send me a plaintext (non-PDF) version that would be great, 
because this is the format that we post at the registry (click on any of 
the "template" links):

https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml

Thanks!

Peter

> 
> Thanks for your support.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Ivan Marin
> GLEIF Business Development
>   
>   
> 
> On 17/12/21, 21:47, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter@mozilla.com> wrote:
> 
>      Hi Ivan,
>      
>      Thanks for your work on this and your patience with the review team.
>      
>      Here are a few small suggestions regarding your request.
>      
>      "Namespace Identifier:  Requested of IANA (formal)"
>      
>      Presumably this should be:
>      
>      "Namespace Identifier:  LEI"
>      
>      We can probably shorten the "Purpose" section but it's fine as is
>      (although let's remove the questions/guidance copied over from the
>      template itself).
>      
>      With regard to the syntax and equivalence, urn:LEI:foo should be
>      equivalent to urn:lei:foo and in general we have not specified that the
>      Namespace Identifier is uppercase (e.g., "LEI") with past registrations:
>      
>      https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml
>      
>      Everything else looks fine to me and I can work with IANA to add this
>      NID to the registry.
>      
>      Peter
>      
>      On 9/21/21 2:21 AM, Ivan Marin wrote:
>      > Hi,
>      >
>      > we have generated a new version attached adding some more information of
>      > the existing LEI system (which we are asking the namespace registration
>      > for) that is mature and providing already service world wide.
>      >
>      > Let us know please if you need further information and what else is
>      > needed from our side to get the namespace released.
>      >
>      > Thanks,
>      >
>      > *Ivan Marin*
>      > GLEIF Business Development
>      > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
>      > Global Legal Entity IdentifierFoundation (GLEIF)
>      > Bleichstrasse 59, 60313, Frankfurtam Main, Germany
>      > Work Phone: +49 69 9074999-22
>      > Cell phone: +34 670 246 255
>      > Email: Ivan.Marin@gleif.org <mailto:Ivan.Marin@gleif.org>
>      > Web: www.gleif.org <http://www.gleif.org>
>      >
>      >
>      > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
>      > Global Legal Entity IdentifierFoundation (GLEIF)
>      > St. Alban-Vorstadt 5, PO Box,4002 Basel, Switzerland
>      > Chairman of the Board: StevenJoachim
>      > CEO: Stephan Wolf
>      > Commercial-Register-No.: CHE-200.595.965
>      > LEI: 506700GE1G29325QX363
>      >
>      > This message may containconfidential and/or privilegedinformation. If
>      > you are not theintended recipient or if you havereceived this message in
>      > error,please notify the sender anddelete this message. Anyunauthorised
>      > copying, disclosureor distribution of this message is strictly forbidden.
>      >
>      >> On 13 Sep 2021, at 10:01, Ivan Marin <Ivan.Marin@Gleif.org
>      >> <mailto:Ivan.Marin@Gleif.org>> wrote:
>      >>
>      >> Thanks for your feedback Mr. Worley.
>      >>
>      >> Besides the document shared, you can also find all the information
>      >> regarding LEI here:
>      >> https://www.gleif.org/en/about-lei/introducing-the-legal-entity-identifier-lei
>      >> <https://www.gleif.org/en/about-lei/introducing-the-legal-entity-identifier-lei>
>      >>
>      >> Indeed as you have stated the LEI system is already well-developed and
>      >> standardized and all the LEI namespace registration provides is a
>      >> systematic way of mapping existing LEIs into URNs.
>      >>
>      >> We are willing to read your revised version. Let us know any question
>      >> you may have.
>      >>
>      >> Regards,
>      >> Ivan Marin
>      >> GLEIF Business Development
>      >>
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> On 11/9/21, 04:10, "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com
>      >> <mailto:worley@ariadne.com>> wrote:
>      >>
>      >>    Please consider revising your descriptions to emphasize certain points
>      >>    which I only fully grasped as I had nearly finished reading the
>      >>    document.
>      >>
>      >>    When I started reading the document, I was unaware of the system of
>      >> LEIs
>      >>    that already exists, and so without thinking I assumed that all of what
>      >>    you describe is a proposed system.  Instead, the LEI system is already
>      >>    well-developed and standardized and all the LEI namespace registration
>      >>    provides is a systematic way of mapping existing LEIs into URNs.
>      >>
>      >>    I suspect that this misunderstanding is due to minor matters of
>      >> wording,
>      >>    combined with the fact that I was reading the registration quite
>      >>    quickly.  But as you prepare a revised version please consider my
>      >>    mistake.
>      >>
>      >>    Dale
>      >>
>      >>
>      >
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > urn mailing list
>      > urn@ietf.org
>      > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
>      
>