Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'

Joachim Wackerow <> Wed, 28 April 2021 11:25 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4838D3A25E7 for <>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.419
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4mMT3D2_0qPl for <>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFEA53A25DE for <>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 04:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from submission ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816032400E5 for <>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:25:24 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;; s=2017; t=1619609124; bh=ccGzzYLp84Q7drXeZPrsWR60Z10wtvxYfuKTKEmHxv0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=GCwcETmAQEKoKoADjv4WNJkx7VZWiEZeJQcFgevjWABK+SdhSt8EO4sOQSgyf4KDP tCMLdXxCg3w4xCjZx6CMRMhsEsrO3Ol15h1GXWF/tYQaKzjpnTXBSQlo7auCtkqXVu kQAe+H5e+OpVJKH+uYt8fNF+HtOuKh+ko99/rcmnacja29Q3YjNuKi96gPEyVvjUGp t4rSHd6RmrWzDIfRsIgYD/Vtn2ASbsahw6UOgKpPPsTifFHvbt01BqfzP2vgTse/D1 pIowaFiKyNa9t6bnOeezq+dyGk/lqFwGUIQQVPzHDqmp/qFyyLyp07GmpCGgDjpL0M PX81PLVbKcScg==
Received: from customer (localhost []) by submission ( with ESMTPSA id 4FVbsH51vQz9rxB for <>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:25:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Joachim Wackerow" <>
To: <>
References: <00e201d6fe5c$534efc60$f9ecf520$> <> <> <00f101d6ffae$5896ab70$09c40250$> <> <012101d700b5$6b29c8a0$417d59e0$> <> <012701d70152$9c63c810$d52b5830$>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:25:22 +0000
Message-ID: <003301d73c21$2e32fdc0$8a98f940$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQHW/ouys/jTBhoHTVS4R3ZNnD7+eapPsw+AgAGB8BCAAKkCAIABiO7g///7QQCAAUEGEIAUAtcwgGGdq4A=
Content-Language: de
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:25:38 -0000

Hello Peter and all,

I'm not familiar with the procedure, therefore I have again some questions.

1. What is the status of the DDI URN registration procedure? When will it be approved?
2. Does it make sense that I apply for the NAPTR registration in case the DDI URN is not approved yet?
3. I submitted the DDI URN document as Internet-Draft (see below). Do I need to take some action on this beside the submission?

Thank you for your advice

-----Original Message-----
From: Joachim Wackerow <> 
Sent: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2021 09:44
To: 'Peter Saint-Andre' <>om>; '' <>
Subject: RE: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'

Hallo Peter,

The document is now submitted as Internet-Draft, see:

The submitted version differs to the version which I submitted on this list on 2021-02-11 only regarding the sections "Status of this Memo" and "Copyright Notice". It was necessary to change them in order to conform to the related rules.


-----Original Message-----
From: urn <> On Behalf Of Joachim Wackerow
Sent: Freitag, 12. Februar 2021 16:21
To: 'Peter Saint-Andre' <>om>;
Subject: Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'

Thank you Peter.

Do I understand right that it would make sense to go both paths?
You submit the extracted registration template to IANA and I submit the document as Internet-Draft. Interested readers could get the full context.

For the NAPTR registration, I will proceed according to the instructions in RFC 3405 when IANA registered the namespace.
Could you please inform me when the namespace is registered?

Thanks again

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Saint-Andre <> 
Sent: Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2021 21:54
To: Joachim Wackerow <>de>;
Subject: Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'

Hallo Joachim,

For the URN namespace registration, it is not necessary for you to
submit an Internet-Draft or publish an RFC (we made the procedure more
lightweight when in RFC 8141 compared to RFC 3406). Naturally, you are
free to submit an Internet-Draft if you would like readers to understand
the full context for the namespace registration; however, my plan was to
extract the registration template from your document and submit that to
the IANA directly (in my role as team lead for URN registrations).

For the NAPTR registration, indeed please follow the instructions in
Section 5 of RFC 3405.


On 2/11/21 1:35 PM, Joachim Wackerow wrote:
> Hallo Peter,
> Attached is the final copy of the document. I created the document in Word with the template [RFC5385]. The PDF version is saved from Word. The .txt version is created from the Word file according to the instructions in RFC5385.
> Please advise me on some more questions:
> - Where will the document be provided?
> - Should I submit the document at 
> - We plan to apply for a NAPTR registration (replacement according to RFC3405. Where and when should I apply for this? Is the email list "" (mentioned in RFC3405) the correct option or
> Thanks
> Joachim 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Saint-Andre <> 
> Sent: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2021 22:45
> To: Joachim Wackerow <>de>;
> Subject: Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'
> Hallo Joachim,
> Please send us a final copy of your document so that we can extract the
> template and request that IANA register the namespace.
> Thanks!
> Peter
> On 2/10/21 6:12 AM, Joachim Wackerow wrote:
>> Hello Juha, Dale, and all,
>> Juha and Dale: thanks for checking and the approval.
>> What would be the next steps? Please give me advice.
>> Thanks
>> Joachim
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hakala, Juha E <> 
>> Sent: Dienstag, 9. Februar 2021 13:38
>> To: Dale R. Worley <>om>; Joachim Wackerow
>> <>
>> Cc:
>> Subject: VS: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'
>> Hello Joachim, 
>> I agree with Dale - the text is OK. As far as I am concerned, it can be
>> approved in its present form. 
>> Best regards, 
>> Juha
>> -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
>> Lähettäjä: urn <> Puolesta Dale R. Worley
>> Lähetetty: tiistai 9. helmikuuta 2021 4.32
>> Vastaanottaja: Joachim Wackerow <>
>> Kopio:
>> Aihe: Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'
>> "Joachim Wackerow" <> writes:
>>> Hello Dale, Juha and all,
>>> Attached is the new version with changes according to your comments.
>>> Thanks again for the detailed hints.
>> The changes look good to me.
>> Dale
>> _______________________________________________
>> urn mailing list
>> _______________________________________________
>> urn mailing list
> _______________________________________________
> urn mailing list

urn mailing list