[urn] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08: (with COMMENT)

[Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I have a different take on Adam's discuss point. I don't think its appropriate
for this draft to both obsolete 3044 and 3187 and make them historical. This
draft doesn't replace them. And since IANA may have to deal with a mix of old
and new templates for some transition period, it doesn't remove the need for
them.

Instead, I think it would make more sense for this draft to just change their
status to historical, but not obsolete them. And also mention that in the
abstract :-) .