Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141bis document

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 21 February 2013 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D81A21F8E92 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:06:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N8kFNpwOrhJs for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:06:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D41A21F8E79 for <urn@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:06:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k10so23378iea.19 for <urn@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:06:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m86FutkQyWkx4EAgnmCQ61V2CsUGbP1ivlQsAZGcp5c=; b=uyt4ZUT0SVTlEy6LfTAV8ZoEJZmb/YqQGvuPYLcl5PTo9Me3hzOk6nAXEbJEQK/DYP XrrJ5DbXTpwNKKp2X+Yjv/BT+qA9pQFboQFfX7g6C+uwFYsLgeg+O5Gw10G4ItB8BM0W zdwtg9JrMuTscXfKxnlVKBhnahNWGir1bgfCaNHRtpecWU5AWMbG+KbSB7lZM1wCSxmN 0XAZ80cbXhh385efAmuGPpIjslm+c5Ma+L6pVNtsmVXfbQaNhj8nnJqgov1+olUpypzx NEIP2heYmrTi5ZcI24KArt8ISSaWlrAx3lek3FyPsZ36oRUVhS7vX+fwCA17G+gkd3ue ieaQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.88.199 with SMTP id bi7mr13081979igb.70.1361484394753; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.43.135.202 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:06:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <51244D4D.3030302@stpeter.im>
References: <CAAQiQRe+wCBmKfm7up8XY-4RxLnktZiz+nuanprygGcHAYdqAw@mail.gmail.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E36EF2DC4@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <F97E15A0-480C-414B-A4E4-A8F5C2037153@semanticidentity.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E3702754D@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <CA+9kkMDnKYU9oJN_xMQ8RA5A_0fAz5W=U_J6N0J5Wan4RwXVuw@mail.gmail.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E37027BC9@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <CA+9kkMAhRF0K1+APV=XH3TbxBLGw8sGX6uhgbYRShbS-OabBnw@mail.gmail.com> <51244D4D.3030302@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:06:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAWLYPswq6-oDo4poTW5jCSsXfYG2WGjeEttzTEHE357A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141bis document
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:06:35 -0000

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Old thread alert!

>
> Ted, with respect to permissiveness, do you mean registration of URI
> schemes or URN namespaces (or something else)?
>
I think my main point is that we now see the registration process differently.
We want people to notify the community that they are using a particular
scheme, so that we can avoid collision; to maximize that, we're minimize
other sorts of review (including pushback like "this should be  a URN").
Anyone can make the same claims about a new URI scheme as are made
for a URN under that approach.

Ted