Re: [urn] ZigBee Alliance "zcl" URN Formal Application

"Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de> Wed, 16 January 2019 10:51 UTC

Return-Path: <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1A312950A for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 02:51:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LuJ4Vh00FIPU for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 02:51:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.dnb.de (prodfix-out0.dnb.de [193.175.100.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA9E8128CF3 for <urn@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 02:51:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dnb-tmg.ad.ddb.de (tmg.dnb.de [10.69.66.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dnb.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2B8B4E5CC79; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:51:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dnb-tmg.ad.ddb.de (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8605A4052; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:51:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dnb-tmg.ad.ddb.de (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCDAA4041; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:51:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dnbf-ex.AD.DDB.DE (unknown [10.69.63.244]) by dnb-tmg.ad.ddb.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:51:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dnbf-ex.AD.DDB.DE (10.69.63.244) by dnbf-ex.AD.DDB.DE (10.69.63.244) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.1.669.32; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:51:12 +0100
Received: from dnbf-ex.AD.DDB.DE ([fe80::3576:7565:4f15:49c7]) by dnbf-ex.AD.DDB.DE ([fe80::3576:7565:4f15:49c7%4]) with mapi id 15.01.0669.032; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:51:12 +0100
From: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
CC: "vberrios@zigbee.org" <vberrios@zigbee.org>, "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>, "urn-nid@apps.ietf.org" <urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>, "Harvey, Roy" <Roy.Harvey@osram.com>
Thread-Topic: [urn] ZigBee Alliance "zcl" URN Formal Application
Thread-Index: AQHUpvmUGP9oYWdox0+kYIZzdUJ+ZqWxwRdg
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:51:12 +0000
Message-ID: <1b516b58df1041948913ec54838eadcc@dnb.de>
References: <AM5PR0701MB286658F2DF5258AC6C511B068C890@AM5PR0701MB2866.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> (Roy.Harvey@osram.com) <87r2dn996c.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
In-Reply-To: <87r2dn996c.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.69.12.174]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.1844-8.2.0.1013-24366.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--29.780-5.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--29.780-5.0-31-10
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.1844-8.2.1013-24366.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--29.779600-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 6otD/cJAac2nykMun0J1wqJVTu7sjgg1kdF7loYFTK1HJ8oIS5faKvYV +0g4ZB1V7/w48fAiha+/YO4Hwaf0SF77Twno8dSzwR3oBUcW2mNB+8LAeeOOMPgnJH5vm2+gPQl KJ9DUxnnMZuRXjbIiHLHYk2Gsxjdb1xQ2OgXti5WvPooS+PUQcqa5gqfkY5ootXl9IxEPXOrkhX Ey2xK9dJFsycqitbkvDRtpfDiE+nHd2zF0bWP2B5MSBMTQNiSA+KgiyLtJrSA8guXXRtiXIEfVd jfRv+TC/G26v9h/FJv6X9vlQUOrY2NKRVYWNEScqbg9uWhLYLd1k+gP1XamtJsoi2XrUn/J5DRV VehENPKrusVRy4an8bxAi7jPoeEQftwZ3X11IV0=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/D8kePwfi0Plt7mIfDK7XgEDOVQ4>
Subject: Re: [urn] ZigBee Alliance "zcl" URN Formal Application
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:51:19 -0000

Dale,

Thanks for forwarding this to the urn list. I'm currently not monitoring urn-nid so I didn't get Roy's message.

Two minor comments on this:
1) (procedure) RFC 8141 says that templates are to be sent to urn@ietf.org, not urn-nid@ietf.org. Since the application precedes RFC 8141, that should be OK.
2) (template) Roy's mail talks about "the process and template in RFC 8141" but the registration template is the one from RFC 2141 and the text also refers to RFC 2141. Since we've taken so long to process this registration, I don't think it would be fair to require the registrant to use the new template from RFC 8141.

I vote for approval, too.

Best,

Lars

> -----Original Message-----
> From: urn [mailto:urn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dale R. Worley
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2019 3:26 AM
> To: Harvey, Roy <Roy.Harvey@osram.com>
> Cc: vberrios@zigbee.org; urn@ietf.org; urn-nid@apps.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [urn] ZigBee Alliance "zcl" URN Formal Application
> 
> "Harvey, Roy" <Roy.Harvey@osram.com> writes:
> > In 2016, the Zigbee Alliance requested a URN Namespace ID, "zcl", via
> > the process and template in RFC 8141.  Dale Worley provided feedback,
> > which was incorporated into a revised application sent in August 2016
> > to urn-nid@apps.ietf.org<mailto:urn-nid@apps.ietf.org> .  Zigbee has
> > not received notification of acceptance or issues with the
> > application.
> 
> Administrative details:
> 
> The messages on urn-nid are:
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid/current/msg01428.html
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid/current/msg01429.html
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid/current/msg01430.html
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid/current/msg01431.html
> 
> The version of the URN definition attached to the message I'm replying
> to (Roy.Harvey@osram.com, 7 Jan 2019) is the same as the "revised
> definition" in the 3rd of the above messages (msg01430).
> 
> My opinion;
> 
> As I stated in the 4th of the above messages (msg01431), "Clearly, that
> takes care of all my concerns."  I believe we should approve this
> application.
> 
> Dale
> 
> _______________________________________________
> urn mailing list
> urn@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn