Re: [urn] GVAT registration request

Yes, I will send the registration request to IANA.

Peter

On 5/2/23 4:22 AM, Miksa, Tomasz wrote:
> Great, thank you very much!
> 
> I understand that the next step is the publication of the template on the IANA website and this will happen "automatically", right?
> 
> Tomasz
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars G. Svensson <lars.svensson@web.de>
> Sent: piątek, 21 kwietnia 2023 18:25
> To: 'Peter Saint-Andre' <stpeter@stpeter.im>; Miksa, Tomasz <tomasz.miksa@tuwien.ac.at>
> Cc: urn@ietf.org
> Subject: AW: [urn] GVAT registration request
> 
> +1
> 
> Best,
> 
> Lars
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: urn [mailto:urn-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Peter Saint-Andre
> Gesendet: Freitag, 21. April 2023 17:38
> An: Miksa, Tomasz <tomasz.miksa@tuwien.ac.at>
> Cc: urn@ietf.org
> Betreff: Re: [urn] GVAT registration request
> 
> This looks good. I approve.
> 
> Peter
> 
> On 4/21/23 6:12 AM, Miksa, Tomasz wrote:
>> Thanks again for the careful review of our specifications. You helped us improve it.
>>
>> I enclose hopefully the final revision. I made the following changes:
>> 1. Fixed the notation for the object as suggested by Dale. It is now:
>> 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 / %x2D). I know that it allows a
>> situation in which the object consists of "-" only, which may not be
>> ideal, but I believe it is better to keep the formulation simple,
>> rather than come up with something more complex like 1*(%x41–5A /
>> %x61–7A / %x30–39) (%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 / %x2D)
>>
>> 2. Rephrased the Resolution section as suggested by @Juha. It captures very well the gist of what we are up to.
>>
>> Apart from this, no other changes were made.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Tomasz
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lars G. Svensson <lars.svensson@web.de>
>> Sent: piątek, 21 kwietnia 2023 11:26
>> To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>; Dale R. Worley
>> <worley@ariadne.com>; Miksa, Tomasz <tomasz.miksa@tuwien.ac.at>
>> Cc: urn@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [urn] GVAT registration request
>>
>> Having read the specification, I have no comments and agree with the registration of GVAT as a urn namespace.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Lars
>>
>> Am 18.04.2023 um 22:38 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
>>> On 4/18/23 12:43 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>>>> I have only one remaining comment.  There appears to be a typo:
>>>>
>>>> "Miksa, Tomasz" <tomasz.miksa@tuwien.ac.at> writes:
>>>> ...
>>>>> Ad. object
>>>>> Yes, we are aware of the lack of German characters. We really
>>>>> intend to ensure no semantics in the identifiers. One change we did
>>>>> was to introduce the "-", to have better overlap with UUID and
>>>>> DOIs, in case any of them is used in the future. Now it is:
>>>>> 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 ) %x2D
>>>> ...
>>>>>        object                 = 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 )
>>>>> %x2D
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> As written, this means one or more alphanumeric characters, then
>>>> always followed by "-".  I assume that the intent is
>>>>
>>>>         object                 = 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 /
>>>> %x2D
>>>> )
>>>>
>>>> that is, alphanumerics arbitrarily mixed with "-".
>>>
>>> Good catch, and agreed.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> urn mailing list
>>> urn@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
> 
> _______________________________________________
> urn mailing list
> urn@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn