[urn] draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-21.txt and change information
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 27 February 2017 14:56 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D904F12A0AB for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 06:56:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uo-z0AlnN0gg for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 06:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 700CD129E53 for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 06:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.70] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1ciMj1-00056L-3q for urn@ietf.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:56:31 -0500
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:56:24 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: urn@ietf.org
Message-ID: <DE428FF0068515E3E93BC2AE@PSB>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.70
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/EYigBmFaKSJ5P0tYAVPviBq9lDY>
Subject: [urn] draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-21.txt and change information
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:56:35 -0000
Hi. The post-last-call version of draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn has been posted. For the information of the WG, it responds to all Last Call comments posted during the Last Call period. I believe that all of those comments and discussions were posted to this mailing list but, in case anyone feels like checking, the ones that affected the document were certainly posted to the IETF one. The changes are all editorial, including getting the one instance of "Basic Latin repertoire" out of the document and adding a paragraph to the IANA Considerations section to repeat and clarify the mailing list to be used for new registrations (and request a tombstone or alias for the old one). best, john p.s. For those who are wondering, the other significant document in the WG's queue, draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition is awaiting some text and signoff from Juha, who has been on vacation. I hope to have a version that should be ready for final WG review posted within the next week or so. ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Date: Monday, February 27, 2017 06:30 -0800 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: urn@ietf.org Subject: [urn] I-D Action: draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-21.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Uniform Resource Names, Revised of the IETF. Title : Uniform Resource Names (URNs) Authors : Peter Saint-Andre John C Klensin Filename : draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-21.txt Pages : 43 Date : 2017-02-27 Abstract: A Uniform Resource Name (URN) is a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) that is assigned under the "urn" URI scheme and a particular URN namespace, with the intent that the URN will be a persistent, location-independent resource identifier. With regard to URN syntax, this document defines the canonical syntax for URNs (in a way that is consistent with URI syntax), specifies methods for determining URN- equivalence, and discusses URI conformance. With regard to URN namespaces, this document specifies a method for defining a URN namespace and associating it with a namespace identifier, and describes procedures for registering namespace identifiers with the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA). This document obsoletes both RFC 2141 and RFC 3406. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-ur n/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-21 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-u rn-21 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ urn mailing list urn@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn ---------- End Forwarded Message ----------
- [urn] draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-21.txt and… John C Klensin