Re: [urn] draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-07 just posted

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 10 May 2017 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F56129449 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 06:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zHqmdiIYvjUa for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2017 06:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EACC129A9F for <urn@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2017 06:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1d8RF5-000NdJ-S2; Wed, 10 May 2017 09:01:23 -0400
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 09:01:18 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
cc: urn@ietf.org
Message-ID: <89710F9B7EE34188727E04F7@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCUqWdXdURhKWdTJ6V-EycBjaQh19z39xDTMFxiUNLZ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E59DDB721C99E3A1A7702072@PSB> <CAC4RtVCUqWdXdURhKWdTJ6V-EycBjaQh19z39xDTMFxiUNLZ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/LlGQGZ56N1n5REUbS31nCBUUiQA>
Subject: Re: [urn] draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition-07 just posted
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 13:01:26 -0000

Sorry, should have caught that.  That was almost certainly the
result of rearranging the text too many times.  Fixed in -08
(which I'm not going to repost for this unless someone
specifically asks).

    john


--On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 18:43 -0400 Barry Leiba
<barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:

> A minor WGLC comment:
> IDnits complains that the references to RFCs 3044 and 3187
> have no citations.  It's not a big deal, but I suggest fixing
> that by turning the parenthesized items at the start of
> Section 2 into formal citations.