Re: [urn] Request for new URN namespace review: LEX

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 07 November 2017 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF606129478; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 14:51:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.721
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=ZzgBZlXt; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=kSCqC3Dy
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id teGJmcdmg-Q2; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 14:51:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E3D412951F; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 14:51:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E9BC20D89; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 17:50:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Nov 2017 17:50:58 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=ddgde1fZoZbcS4aHHjOlBDXCJmCfervIffTB2bbQvqk=; b=ZzgBZlXt ljHfd0jKDwQ+HxPofLXcUBjy4j49qtueTow3qK0GWFuxjT0H5/ALqjS+0taJbU2K ziM82co1Ng+RmqPMXT2ZdwkvVOC2+uczh7awKlJsAAdJKdZAMDxxNJl4eQtkAcjx wPzejO5LyTLMwlGUdAYRRMfe0VWxlguEEopdS0wNrXa+TGLHr0SADekzA6ZzuJQE 5E7uYeSfOdypwOADnGFxBAMEoGYOS8UuZqdZQC/2Xuma6p1vD6KHmfClf9IdjZVa mXcPEBlKEG/9QyslR+Am7+pExuKzQJhTXKnz0+wxjGVKt4EbG0P0DQ70qT14tK8y J/3U5+0JZKvUTg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=ddgde1fZoZbcS4aHHjOlBDXCJmCfe rvIffTB2bbQvqk=; b=kSCqC3DyPak3eyGg1ExLHofACyAvOgfhJOyKOdy0Hg+bx jdvU0Otj+7PrXqInRa61946nqo7l9C73Ubx6dGNP711G9vckUa0u6aT/h8Zt+PxR ptEgWTovnOdXDq9EfrF3Fglh6l+gj5HJO7UsuKqi9tGEamxc2l12qsrHYHKg4wqd j+t/p8fwX4QoVL1NWWeV/cEg4pgcG+DwrmDBH/WIJHTS2LKSbNOuUJi2duKUR7+B PQRIIzgHtemaXI2TPtzS4nJ/z9hVmvRv4+hDWUGr8dW4c3fMBD+ubzaUuutCT4aB lz4WJgtXkCcGD6URd36OsZGyoNI4yhf24wwnbAZvA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:0jgCWovbjC0RDREZ_sMiWUqcZGjvoIZa8DYUtfJ2O_h3dxl1oeUJ8g>
Received: from aither.local (unknown [76.25.3.152]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C4EE67FAC9; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 17:50:57 -0500 (EST)
To: Enrico Francesconi <francesconi@ittig.cnr.it>, "Hakala, Juha E" <juha.hakala@helsinki.fi>
Cc: Pierluigi Spinosa <pierluigi.spinosa@gmail.com>, "draft-spinosa-urn-lex.all@ietf.org" <draft-spinosa-urn-lex.all@ietf.org>, "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
References: <1505909590.1544977.1112321704.5FEB92F9@webmail.messagingengine.com> <HE1PR07MB30999669B5A9BD90F3FB69A1FA660@HE1PR07MB3099.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <59D492AC-FEC7-48D9-84B6-614BB0B0223D@ittig.cnr.it> <2AC1F018-9E90-4071-928C-2803AD1290E0@ittig.cnr.it> <HE1PR07MB3099F63CAAAD3610CB2BAF86FA480@HE1PR07MB3099.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <EEB55577-C1E1-42A3-98C2-8616C460F183@ittig.cnr.it>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Message-ID: <8204cf1f-c7aa-4305-e1f0-03f6659bc4d4@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 15:50:56 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EEB55577-C1E1-42A3-98C2-8616C460F183@ittig.cnr.it>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fxNf58kSFTFDvwB2flOpoH4ReaTKn3VXM"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/LlrCDSVtxAM3tpdX2Fe6R54kmyk>
Subject: Re: [urn] Request for new URN namespace review: LEX
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 22:51:02 -0000

One comment on syntax...

On 10/24/17 2:33 PM, Enrico Francesconi wrote:

>> Req: As regards syntax, concerns about un-encoded use of @ to indicate
>> an expression of a work
>> To Deepen: not clear the motivations
>> Juha: the motivation was just to say that it is necessary to percent
>> encode special characters which cannot be expressed in HTTP URIs in
>> unencoded form, such as @.
> 
> For the users this problem will be transparent. 

I think Juha's concern is that the namespace specification should define
the encoding rules to ensure consistent translation between the URN form
and the HTTP URI serialization described in "Attachment D".

Peter