[urn] Status of draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3044bis-issn-urn-00

Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Tue, 06 March 2012 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <A.Hoenes@TR-Sys.de>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A096721F881A for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 01:36:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.376
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.376 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.373, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8y97dgTXOLBj for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 01:36:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TR-Sys.de (gateway.tr-sys.de [213.178.172.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CB821F8817 for <urn@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 01:36:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ZEUS.TR-Sys.de by w. with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.37.109.26 $/16.3.2) id AA126706529; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:35:29 +0100
Received: (from ah@localhost) by z.TR-Sys.de (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183)/8.7.3) id KAA00789; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:35:27 +0100 (MEZ)
From: Alfred =?hp-roman8?B?SM5uZXM=?= <ah@TR-Sys.de>
Message-Id: <201203060935.KAA00789@TR-Sys.de>
To: urn@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:35:27 +0100 (MEZ)
X-Mailer: ELM [$Revision: 1.17.214.3 $]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=hp-roman8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [urn] Status of draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3044bis-issn-urn-00
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:36:33 -0000

[ speaking as a WG chair ]

URN folks,
it looks like software transition artifacts have negatively affected
the submission of  draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3044bis-issn-urn-00
(as announced to the list in the message filed at
  http://www.IETF.ORG/mail-archive/web/urn/current/msg01704.html
) :

- Publication of the draft has been inadvertently delayed for
  more than a week; this has been resolved yesterday by manual
  intervention of the IETF Secretariat -- thanks!

- In some web pages, the draft is still listed as an individual draft,
  not a WG draft; this will be corrected -- that draft indeed _is_ a
  chartered work item of URNbis, and it has been accepted as such.

Thanks to Pierre Godefroy and his co-workers from the ISSN
International Center for taking up this project !

Kind regards,
  Alfred.