IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [urn] new draft 10 - new form (RE: new draft 9 - RE: new urn PWID draft (7) with corrections)

Eld Zierau <elzi@kb.dk> Thu, 31 October 2019 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <elzi@kb.dk>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3706E120273 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 03:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zE3N13HwqL2o for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 03:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out12.electric.net (smtp-out12.electric.net [89.104.206.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BE161201DC for <urn@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 03:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1iQ87u-0003X1-T6 by out12d.electric.net with emc1-ok (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <elzi@kb.dk>) id 1iQ87u-0003cR-VQ; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 03:56:26 -0700
Received: by emcmailer; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 03:56:26 -0700
Received: from [92.43.124.147] (helo=deliveryscan.hostedsepo.dk) by out12d.electric.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <elzi@kb.dk>) id 1iQ87u-0003X1-T6; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 03:56:26 -0700
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.72.17.201]) by deliveryscan.hostedsepo.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1F9A042F; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:56:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 10.72.17.201 ([10.72.17.201]) by dispatch-outgoing.hostedsepo.dk (JAMES SMTP Server 2.3.2-1) with SMTP ID 980; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:56:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from out12d.electric.net (smtp-out12.electric.net [89.104.206.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "electric.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by pf1.outpostscan-mta.hostedsepo.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88AA5A0421; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:56:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 1iQ87s-0003Ns-VH by out12d.electric.net with hostsite:2468467 (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <elzi@kb.dk>) id 1iQ87t-0003Sy-UV; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 03:56:25 -0700
Received: by emcmailer; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 03:56:25 -0700
Received: from [92.43.124.46] (helo=pf1.outprescan-mta.hostedsepo.dk) by out12d.electric.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <elzi@kb.dk>) id 1iQ87s-0003Ns-VH; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 03:56:24 -0700
Received: from post.kb.dk (post-03.kb.dk [130.226.226.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by pf1.outprescan-mta.hostedsepo.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 501FFA0423; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:56:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EXCH-02.kb.dk (exch-02.kb.dk [10.5.0.112]) by post.kb.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0614C9285B; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:56:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EXCH-02.kb.dk (10.5.0.112) by EXCH-02.kb.dk (10.5.0.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1847.3; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:56:23 +0100
Received: from EXCH-02.kb.dk ([fe80::b595:1a1f:5666:b29]) by EXCH-02.kb.dk ([fe80::b595:1a1f:5666:b29%7]) with mapi id 15.01.1847.003; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:56:23 +0100
From: Eld Zierau <elzi@kb.dk>
To: "'Dale R. Worley'" <worley@ariadne.com>
CC: "juha.hakala@helsinki.fi" <juha.hakala@helsinki.fi>, "stpeter@stpeter.im" <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [urn] new draft 10 - new form (RE: new draft 9 - RE: new urn PWID draft (7) with corrections)
Thread-Index: AQHViUNK+qjPgwfDLUK1AOZ2SsxNdad0nagw
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:56:23 +0000
Message-ID: <b5e9672249cd40da9e1bd8ba54be2b99@kb.dk>
References: <2396dbcf66bb4c8689bcbabca2cc8492@kb.dk> (elzi@kb.dk) <87eez4w82j.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
In-Reply-To: <87eez4w82j.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Accept-Language: da-DK, en-US
Content-Language: da-DK
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.226.229.95]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_003_b5e9672249cd40da9e1bd8ba54be2b99kbdk_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-IP: 92.43.124.46
X-Env-From: elzi@kb.dk
X-Proto: esmtps
X-Revdns: outprescan-mta.hostedsepo.dk
X-HELO: pf1.outprescan-mta.hostedsepo.dk
X-TLS: TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256
X-Authenticated_ID:
X-PolicySMART: 10573177, 19718497
X-Virus-Status: Scanned by VirusSMART (b)
X-Virus-Status: Scanned by VirusSMART (c)
X-Outbound-IP: 92.43.124.147
X-Env-From: elzi@kb.dk
X-Proto: esmtps
X-Revdns: deliveryscan.hostedsepo.dk
X-HELO: deliveryscan.hostedsepo.dk
X-TLS: TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256
X-Authenticated_ID:
X-Virus-Status: Scanned by VirusSMART (b)
X-Virus-Status: Scanned by VirusSMART (c)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/Mbcn0R3AlpOKH3Sj7OO-dLT5A08>
Subject: Re: [urn] new draft 10 - new form (RE: new draft 9 - RE: new urn PWID draft (7) with corrections)
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:56:40 -0000

Thank you Dale

I have generated and attached a text version of the pdf file from the previous mail: 
    draft-pwid-urn-specification-10.txt

I realized that I had generated it with European sized pages which are longer than US sized pages. I have therefore also generated and attached a version with pages fitting to the shorter pages: 
   draft-pwid-urn-specification-10-short-pages.txt

The only difference between the two documents are: the date (in order to distinguish them) and the page numbering in the table of contents

If there are any other issues, please let me know.

Best regards, Eld

-----
Eld Zierau
Digital Preservation Specialist PhD
The Royal Danish Library
Digital Cultural Heritage
P.O. Box 2149, 1016 Copenhagen K
Ph. +45 9132 4690 
Email: elzi@kb.dk

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 3:43 AM
To: Eld Zierau <elzi@kb.dk>
Cc: juha.hakala@helsinki.fi; stpeter@stpeter.im; urn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [urn] new draft 10 - new form (RE: new draft 9 - RE: new urn PWID draft (7) with corrections)

Eld Zierau <elzi@kb.dk> writes:
> It is in a PDF, - please say if you want another format.

Please remember that IETF processes generally work with text documents.
Certainly if they need detailed comment, it's much easier to interline comments with a text original.

Though I don't have any comments on version 10.  I think it answers all of the concerns I had with previous versions.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email