[urn] // in gnunet://, and other P2P URN's

Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> Sat, 20 October 2012 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <giu-urn@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F7C21F860F for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 00:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.11
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aBhA3SJibprB for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 00:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8625B21F860D for <urn@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 00:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <giu-urn@m.gmane.org>) id 1TPTaK-0005vr-Fj for urn@ietf.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:35:04 +0200
Received: from gray.am-1.org ([]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <urn@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:35:04 +0200
Received: from oneingray by gray.am-1.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <urn@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 09:35:04 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: urn@ietf.org
From: Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:27:32 +0700
Lines: 27
Sender: ivan@gray.siamics.net
Message-ID: <86sj997gd7.fsf_-_@gray.siamics.net>
References: <86ehkwcr3v.fsf@gray.siamics.net> <50804510.7080900@grothoff.org> <8662679iun.fsf@gray.siamics.net> <20121019122226.GB21513@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <86mwzi8rfn.fsf_-_@gray.siamics.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: gray.am-1.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xDtJnHKwhAbVncy97gz3rQiWXtU=
Subject: [urn] // in gnunet://, and other P2P URN's
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 07:35:00 -0000

	Well, we've discussed [1] this a bit in p2p-hackers@, and it
	seems that I've ran out of arguments by now.

	The current GNUnet implementation [2] employs URI's like the
	following one for identifying content:


	where 17G…HA0 is (AIUI) the Base32-encoded hash of the content.

	My point was that // in gnunet:// implies some sort of naming
	authority, which ‘fs’ (which names the “filesharing” component
	of GNUnet) is not.  So, presuming that the GNUnet URI scheme
	will (eventually) be submitted for registration with IANA, I've
	suggested to switch to the gnunet:fs: prefix instead.
	Unfortunately, as it now appears, I cannot clearly explain why
	exactly such a change should be made.

	Could this issue be clarified, please?


[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.peer-to-peer.p2p-hackers/3569
[2] http://gnunet.org/

FSF associate member #7257