Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'

Joachim Wackerow <joachim.wackerow@posteo.de> Fri, 12 February 2021 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <joachim.wackerow@posteo.de>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024DF3A1657 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 07:20:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=posteo.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bSt398ykVbHD for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 07:20:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout02.posteo.de (mout02.posteo.de [185.67.36.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B6A93A1747 for <urn@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 07:20:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FF442400FC for <urn@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:20:36 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.de; s=2017; t=1613143238; bh=xatp4MmSKEf23xmAPMJXO6qOFVj3hFx5L4/7mfAgVAA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=H2nC85Av6RbpSUnS0ROrNKXydsJrEyeGElzN/c8atI0NrPyvAlt/KViQlBX5+EgFX ktW4vMr3r/Ap0Ivg+6Q2DJD26RS8O5LbS8HdT8YyqghjirvR9Meyz3bWwxiAqA6nHJ rPqc24GaTc10uFEVKXQ1xpPfqIgCwCQc55Ov5Dl+mSgQSsBuVZr81LZLYYoTyoKZSH 5CAT1CMURtzHt46088x/ezkkEwn3M2W+R+npCVUQ6J99hHRSc7lhXwukZ9ztEy8pBB NhKCxHnRjTDe6zOQrz2tUBwVUYM2+XPDjG+HPzqeXe201UpETJ0z+sGAGPnCeolOS2 Y9hztISJnPtLQ==
Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4DccdG5kzgz6tmN; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:20:34 +0100 (CET)
From: "Joachim Wackerow" <joachim.wackerow@posteo.de>
To: "'Peter Saint-Andre'" <stpeter@mozilla.com>, <urn@ietf.org>
References: <00e201d6fe5c$534efc60$f9ecf520$@posteo.de> <87ft26q8dv.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <HE1PR07MB319698DF94DF364FB6A1FB7DFA8E9@HE1PR07MB3196.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <00f101d6ffae$5896ab70$09c40250$@posteo.de> <8e7a3c30-b19f-d0e5-e40b-715bf378379f@stpeter.im> <012101d700b5$6b29c8a0$417d59e0$@posteo.de> <c8453687-fa75-9863-5a70-9ec2dadd1076@mozilla.com>
In-Reply-To: <c8453687-fa75-9863-5a70-9ec2dadd1076@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:20:32 +0100
Message-ID: <012701d70152$9c63c810$d52b5830$@posteo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQHW/ouys/jTBhoHTVS4R3ZNnD7+eapPsw+AgAGB8BCAAKkCAIABiO7g///7QQCAAUEGEA==
Content-Language: de
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/O6NDmGy2BzxWkQKLaeipQWEWq9A>
Subject: Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:20:46 -0000

Thank you Peter.

Do I understand right that it would make sense to go both paths?
You submit the extracted registration template to IANA and I submit the document as Internet-Draft. Interested readers could get the full context.

For the NAPTR registration, I will proceed according to the instructions in RFC 3405 when IANA registered the namespace.
Could you please inform me when the namespace is registered?

Thanks again
Joachim

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com> 
Sent: Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2021 21:54
To: Joachim Wackerow <joachim.wackerow@posteo.de>de>; urn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'

Hallo Joachim,

For the URN namespace registration, it is not necessary for you to
submit an Internet-Draft or publish an RFC (we made the procedure more
lightweight when in RFC 8141 compared to RFC 3406). Naturally, you are
free to submit an Internet-Draft if you would like readers to understand
the full context for the namespace registration; however, my plan was to
extract the registration template from your document and submit that to
the IANA directly (in my role as team lead for URN registrations).

For the NAPTR registration, indeed please follow the instructions in
Section 5 of RFC 3405.

Peter

On 2/11/21 1:35 PM, Joachim Wackerow wrote:
> Hallo Peter,
> 
> Attached is the final copy of the document. I created the document in Word with the template 2-Word-v2.0.template.dot [RFC5385]. The PDF version is saved from Word. The .txt version is created from the Word file according to the instructions in RFC5385.
> 
> Please advise me on some more questions:
> - Where will the document be provided?
> - Should I submit the document at https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/? 
> - We plan to apply for a NAPTR registration (replacement registry.ddialliance.org) according to RFC3405. Where and when should I apply for this? Is the email list "register@urn.arpa" (mentioned in RFC3405) the correct option or iana@iana.org?
> 
> Thanks
> Joachim 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> 
> Sent: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2021 22:45
> To: Joachim Wackerow <joachim.wackerow@posteo.de>de>; urn@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'
> 
> Hallo Joachim,
> 
> Please send us a final copy of your document so that we can extract the
> template and request that IANA register the namespace.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Peter
> 
> On 2/10/21 6:12 AM, Joachim Wackerow wrote:
>> Hello Juha, Dale, and all,
>>
>> Juha and Dale: thanks for checking and the approval.
>>
>> What would be the next steps? Please give me advice.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Joachim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hakala, Juha E <juha.hakala@helsinki.fi> 
>> Sent: Dienstag, 9. Februar 2021 13:38
>> To: Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com>om>; Joachim Wackerow
>> <joachim.wackerow@posteo.de>
>> Cc: urn@ietf.org
>> Subject: VS: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'
>>
>> Hello Joachim, 
>>
>> I agree with Dale - the text is OK. As far as I am concerned, it can be
>> approved in its present form. 
>>
>> Best regards, 
>>
>> Juha
>>
>> -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
>> Lähettäjä: urn <urn-bounces@ietf.org> Puolesta Dale R. Worley
>> Lähetetty: tiistai 9. helmikuuta 2021 4.32
>> Vastaanottaja: Joachim Wackerow <joachim.wackerow@posteo.de>
>> Kopio: urn@ietf.org
>> Aihe: Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'
>>
>> "Joachim Wackerow" <joachim.wackerow@posteo.de> writes:
>>> Hello Dale, Juha and all,
>>>
>>> Attached is the new version with changes according to your comments.
>>> Thanks again for the detailed hints.
>>
>> The changes look good to me.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> urn mailing list
>> urn@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> urn mailing list
>> urn@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> urn mailing list
> urn@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
>