Re: [urn] Feedback on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-16
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sun, 08 January 2017 07:28 UTC
Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D7D127A91 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:28:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JOMBx7LCfvG7 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:28:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C777E126BF6 for <urn@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:28:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.91.126]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MVJze-1bz5Oh0O4c-00Yl4F; Sun, 08 Jan 2017 08:28:41 +0100
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
References: <ed99a67a-10b6-c505-f223-2250fac836c0@gmx.de> <e041edc5-7a17-e5cb-1bf2-417cfefa827e@gmx.de> <20022D35B6F9EC84EF0C7901@PSB> <ee4de10a-6798-8e89-1395-e9370be6012c@gmx.de> <5463EBE376D888656975178E@PSB>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <987d269d-1c8e-5d54-18e8-3f89e551d1e4@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 08:28:41 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5463EBE376D888656975178E@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:av1XLxvjpUQ5xezBIRJp5AHEaaVfEaDr3vQ8di7fJDTbmYGyz0M 7EMaMYylSWtlAVAcvUOtLCJPAVSmuz9KI6FYrrGaJ6GUnlVYLpVNxsEjtb+5YZh+W0BN17u fKMEF1cixLYv4b7LHe8iEGzq1NQph9Bd7l0foqXHcVw1hxdZzRcMBKxxtgf/BT+2l0wi7Gd XlkCSJmng6Fh61tdmqSZg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:qF2rKJk7JUU=:byXTBn7oObVABz7TKaLys6 oZc6IxUQBmSV6GHzejZOydsOlY8UvjO2zjbVPBds4srbEAhRM366IsOH6wVSBPLf6/RYPMRFa r3p7+DSXy4sjPrhuN1rTWmbtWj3JsZ7a3et1QWQtbSrgjVUslh8MTDu6VHqC0OFNCBt2ymi2+ pcD+1F3soR8NtGUDLTl1wa6+ih09lwGIzhIHx7Mm7xddYb9W1xWSQteOLuYCojdLBf1In/m7h 9GtpR3cT+H3peElAo19UpxPeionYgN7Rj16jFE/zymSQxnqILfRbioP8cTEBNc2i2mm70XxXM wT9IF/vuneuEPANsmcpUSB6lsuw416S+U+Kb2PWkWJlnfVdVLm1ZokWp6PX9JHbmO6o8kzAbW 3MxqY44tmRiw4pn5hNPEFHbUZ8Oouw/9Ci6mFQCwazqNIpqM73ZdFgw2GtPVs10ykR7pFAG2k kDLw3UMrv1U7LVNaBHZfDvZv5bcjr3ddNgoosHVfj92J+SfZ/MDeJskKeqRhA5Wk2cDzq43OE aPdFH/3JtmfdWmmU/J+zDckpw0qLhuIbDcEAhfSgY3GOFTIjRGAnOFmDYPpqiM4ZQq+4SB39E BI2ggPPM958cbTLEaPFa/ofVSQTC//fMcelaLG6Qbbg2JJd65MgrZk4hJXYFB4rxYDdjdYBYk wk6P5oDSTTv5mGTQf4hdAUepiVoMXv5Wp3Czretbbr8I27abi0uqDOc5eYBeuKxo1j5XxUTmI Ml6O4ot6YL4IsCChgy8dNyh+6pQvCi29khjANPsWairvfJFjcyIurBQDe/99FpeYiuu3Cy9ld JX7jRG88Z2qqMTtKkow9t0F3bSckTfT6Qt2vT55vSAd15gz4Z1S2rw3CvrxeHLmYVfIMc0g8F Yo706hSblLDunjiRPn+XKde4Z+ZOx8rWi5rtWt8brk9F3qcVqVvELFMa+cYiXJAx4kPRdMTeY B32zXvzD3fegd1RZuRIzcswxEbmEH/nYv/F3UQ2VYQO6H3gZZn09080kcvCiRnU0K07ucx7zu +LBkCuEuPynykWXSyp+6ab0=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/P8BfBx5O8A2EGY_6nlQFGiNNkrU>
Cc: urn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [urn] Feedback on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-16
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 07:28:56 -0000
On 2017-01-08 07:41, John C Klensin wrote: > ... > If that implies that you expect a complete rewrite as the result > of IETF LC, noted. > ... No, I don't expect that, nor do I think it's needed. What I said is we'll very likely have one more draft after WGLC and one more after IETF LC and IESG discussions. Best regards, Julian
- [urn] Feedback on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-ur… Julian Reschke
- Re: [urn] Feedback on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bi… Julian Reschke
- Re: [urn] Feedback on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bi… John C Klensin
- Re: [urn] Feedback on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bi… Julian Reschke
- Re: [urn] Feedback on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bi… John C Klensin
- Re: [urn] Feedback on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bi… Julian Reschke
- Re: [urn] Feedback on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bi… Hakala, Juha E
- Re: [urn] Feedback on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bi… Julian Reschke
- Re: [urn] Feedback on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bi… Svensson, Lars