IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [urn] draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-17

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Mon, 23 April 2018 02:33 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FAF126DCA for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 19:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.685
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.685 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kgFTiMVTQ1FY for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 19:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8117124B0A for <urn@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 19:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-17v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.113]) by resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id ARHrfMR8A6RoKARHrfVQt5; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 02:33:03 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4603:9471:222:fbff:fe91:d396]) by resomta-ch2-17v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id ARHnfw5WPoKh6ARHpfMEtn; Mon, 23 Apr 2018 02:33:02 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w3N2Ww3i030129; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 22:32:59 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id w3N2WvPk030126; Sun, 22 Apr 2018 22:32:57 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: R Atarius <r_atarius@yahoo.com>
Cc: ben@nostrum.com, georg.mayer.huawei@gmx.com, jbakker@blackberry.com, l.svensson@dnb.de, urn@ietf.org, r_atarius@yahoo.com
In-Reply-To: <567683303.1698864.1523590617180@mail.yahoo.com> (r_atarius@yahoo.com)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2018 22:32:57 -0400
Message-ID: <87wowybqjq.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfATD8XjH7+76uaTwys6YsDJTzawPvZPu3FQlDBmWfUjNztvSXGmJjqGuaRxxOf8n+fGYwKPqMRg2sNjmiQpjLm2l/LJ7vxzH9EbXEfqgZtmgJPhs+7Tv l2ZGpc3I0J6aU3iuNJkz9eFxQK8ELzA4n1RNRg8pQESLnBBOuz7MOsJAWCETWebLQw5HuRggBKqeigdNpTB1sOMgA4UxMERJ87EnIwQ0mNp4GLAaF4UA1w5j 4Hj+SiTMvw9JYu3u1LlqKiZAhCvup8y/PdCGW04FIXPNQUlOKYcsNumSeM/bocW31zEyGeMdMtr9l628PNxtPw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/SfmB-9BfG16ZFH5AZrAeAQftJIQ>
Subject: Re: [urn] draft-atarius-dispatch-meid-urn-17
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 02:33:05 -0000

R Atarius <r_atarius@yahoo.com> writes:
> I am a bit lost with your claim. Anyways, as I asked you before I can
> ask you again if I can leave as it is since it may be good for the
> reader to have that information in the document. Since I have yet not
> read the link you sent so I am not sure what the Wikipedia has listed
> and if it is better than the text I have in the draft. However, if you
> agree that it is beneficial for the reader to have this in the
> document but you think that text needs to be massaged to be better,
> please let me know.

Well, I said in the message that you quote, "I agree that there is no need
to give the somewhat elaborate details of the check digit system in the
RFC."

So:  I think there is no need to give the details of the check digit
system in the RFC.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email