Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com> Thu, 11 February 2021 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56733A195B for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:54:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mozilla.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T5K1jV566afr for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:54:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A60193A1956 for <urn@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:54:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id m20so6310013ilj.13 for <urn@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:54:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FG9J1J+ETcEE9DfDTcIVcrSWcZObreiwH1poX1ZEzfs=; b=PySZeef8fhqMvTIDH/BHo+oSl71QddmFUOFX6GoZnAo75ACINVJSGoRik1+tPOGqIh hecuSVNxxTcqG4qpdyHjO1ISkNH0xGD+j5tQ6hedkVywGnbnvpWuLzLeYxBGDKUDD7cl cyUVchCyvQMy2PlyZUsXL/OEMzgfw2TXyynC8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FG9J1J+ETcEE9DfDTcIVcrSWcZObreiwH1poX1ZEzfs=; b=eBJTC4C5velYM+aMvjW4PRfw1F7Zar67jrrryVFAExkwf1UQtxiU4ucncH9149YNCa WZNgUBX/yEX7CU6xc8q6xIFt05dlgNAUiaiCcaSrVRcenJYpw6OnDK81MVLWk3PTNLyd qWmVjALXBTbtM9hFtSIS7lVr7wIONWrYGR9wc6KAdhWCT98eyBreog83rTrxf6dE0xPe TeStERAQVj4ZQ/Sax1c0LTRkz3F4V30rHL2p39U6urIKAG472lmLuWU2Uy9pT1Ro+DUL kYsCqyKMqdbB2MCKfC81/dbB36zvW8+QbO4+WMskMgR+Rjc87wJKF0N3kUSYQeaFLhtL 2V2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533NaLpeOhiwyLCfxmsPKb0npSXFT5+1o3QbxZ5foAe+QtnNFLKD rYf4tltLk2kmGhjZzMSklC0ylg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwf39yH5tlt40v2f5L6AHR9W1O6SdOT9vbVcJukGIdwEGeRaCp7LzfeE/hDP/CN6v5CPOxjtg==
X-Received: by 2002:a92:ad09:: with SMTP id w9mr7149484ilh.23.1613076842882; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dragon.local ([76.25.3.152]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm2754887ilt.77.2021.02.11.12.54.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:54:02 -0800 (PST)
To: Joachim Wackerow <joachim.wackerow@posteo.de>, urn@ietf.org
References: <00e201d6fe5c$534efc60$f9ecf520$@posteo.de> <87ft26q8dv.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <HE1PR07MB319698DF94DF364FB6A1FB7DFA8E9@HE1PR07MB3196.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <00f101d6ffae$5896ab70$09c40250$@posteo.de> <8e7a3c30-b19f-d0e5-e40b-715bf378379f@stpeter.im> <012101d700b5$6b29c8a0$417d59e0$@posteo.de>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com>
Message-ID: <c8453687-fa75-9863-5a70-9ec2dadd1076@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:54:00 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <012101d700b5$6b29c8a0$417d59e0$@posteo.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/VoI4L6tMmoXiU8-2PzsBrrX6UYU>
Subject: Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 20:54:10 -0000

Hallo Joachim,

For the URN namespace registration, it is not necessary for you to
submit an Internet-Draft or publish an RFC (we made the procedure more
lightweight when in RFC 8141 compared to RFC 3406). Naturally, you are
free to submit an Internet-Draft if you would like readers to understand
the full context for the namespace registration; however, my plan was to
extract the registration template from your document and submit that to
the IANA directly (in my role as team lead for URN registrations).

For the NAPTR registration, indeed please follow the instructions in
Section 5 of RFC 3405.

Peter

On 2/11/21 1:35 PM, Joachim Wackerow wrote:
> Hallo Peter,
> 
> Attached is the final copy of the document. I created the document in Word with the template 2-Word-v2.0.template.dot [RFC5385]. The PDF version is saved from Word. The .txt version is created from the Word file according to the instructions in RFC5385.
> 
> Please advise me on some more questions:
> - Where will the document be provided?
> - Should I submit the document at https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/? 
> - We plan to apply for a NAPTR registration (replacement registry.ddialliance.org) according to RFC3405. Where and when should I apply for this? Is the email list "register@urn.arpa" (mentioned in RFC3405) the correct option or iana@iana.org?
> 
> Thanks
> Joachim 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> 
> Sent: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2021 22:45
> To: Joachim Wackerow <joachim.wackerow@posteo.de>de>; urn@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'
> 
> Hallo Joachim,
> 
> Please send us a final copy of your document so that we can extract the
> template and request that IANA register the namespace.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Peter
> 
> On 2/10/21 6:12 AM, Joachim Wackerow wrote:
>> Hello Juha, Dale, and all,
>>
>> Juha and Dale: thanks for checking and the approval.
>>
>> What would be the next steps? Please give me advice.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Joachim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hakala, Juha E <juha.hakala@helsinki.fi> 
>> Sent: Dienstag, 9. Februar 2021 13:38
>> To: Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com>om>; Joachim Wackerow
>> <joachim.wackerow@posteo.de>
>> Cc: urn@ietf.org
>> Subject: VS: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'
>>
>> Hello Joachim, 
>>
>> I agree with Dale - the text is OK. As far as I am concerned, it can be
>> approved in its present form. 
>>
>> Best regards, 
>>
>> Juha
>>
>> -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
>> Lähettäjä: urn <urn-bounces@ietf.org> Puolesta Dale R. Worley
>> Lähetetty: tiistai 9. helmikuuta 2021 4.32
>> Vastaanottaja: Joachim Wackerow <joachim.wackerow@posteo.de>
>> Kopio: urn@ietf.org
>> Aihe: Re: [urn] Request for the NID 'ddi'
>>
>> "Joachim Wackerow" <joachim.wackerow@posteo.de> writes:
>>> Hello Dale, Juha and all,
>>>
>>> Attached is the new version with changes according to your comments.
>>> Thanks again for the detailed hints.
>>
>> The changes look good to me.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> urn mailing list
>> urn@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> urn mailing list
>> urn@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> urn mailing list
> urn@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
>