Re: [urn] Moving ahead with draft-spinosa-urn-lex

Enrico Francesconi <francesconi@ittig.cnr.it> Wed, 12 December 2018 14:36 UTC

Return-Path: <enrico.francesconi@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD1B1276D0 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:36:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FEXTypPqeKPn for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:36:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-f176.google.com (mail-lj1-f176.google.com [209.85.208.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 679F21252B7 for <urn@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:36:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-f176.google.com with SMTP id l15-v6so16466809lja.9 for <urn@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:36:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FL16Cbe44gjECviyk1pr3asQld90W9UCrDMHGqVe00g=; b=ISApIVUNFhdOkQVP2QKYgdSLRmyY0sAcMNU9rc1hyFCu1DjgXyaHuTpJQatKd4dmFg SCLPfDUydhnfw5OF3fy4h+eGvUixim/K08Uz1md0Hxv1mnwOeF8MyKVPqL0EeNT1t6tz c7j5spZS6BtqTKvjW2FbUv3Qr0SpJibbw5TarzhmkPsxEw7YUzZoRMPT2sIBw2YZZlBo nUIO3JCRc9l2Zhw1LYDA/JFTtKVyTc8y2enOpMZ4uiO+HMn43A8jqjaV990RDqir93t3 44BTypVJlreGMQusbSL4IqBj2ag3HWzzu5ILn0mqi7qcrxZ2uxbrezWTnrgrTEobhB9E q7gA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbZqZxyNDZGaMBNElDziZ74VL9YDSnR+9WtMk/8IjeUmacPfsm8 2bl93xdrNCOoZ2kZdG2uVUWo1lwhNnIGAALARuE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VpkAMHTuiHADBavfRdwU9K/1lfinQR61LJqHKt587y9nhUQegk8kerON5r/JraOGRzS9oC9hNCtYicsvSQJ+8=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5854:: with SMTP id x20-v6mr12220924ljd.31.1544625370397; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:36:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6BFBDEE4-8D30-462A-A8FE-D284116EC42C@ittig.cnr.it> <87bm5re8ty.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
In-Reply-To: <87bm5re8ty.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
From: Enrico Francesconi <francesconi@ittig.cnr.it>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 15:35:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CANPWnkS2ZK3_tJeve_xAL3tR4LAR2FC7L+4YU2WB+eX6mEjE2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, pierluigi.spinosa@gmail.com, L.Svensson@dnb.de, caterina.lupo@gmail.com, stpeter@stpeter.im, urn@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000838628057cd41ec5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/c6K8NdScz7WX4kskNvUE6D6PRIQ>
Subject: Re: [urn] Moving ahead with draft-spinosa-urn-lex
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 14:36:15 -0000

Dear Dale,
   thanks for your feedback! Frankly I don't know who is the responsible,
is it maybe the ietf secretary?
Best
   Enrico

Il giorno mer 12 dic 2018, 04:13 Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com> ha
scritto:

> Enrico Francesconi <francesconi@ittig.cnr.it> writes:
> > being quite a long time since the last communication (June 2018), we
> > were wondering whether any action from our side is needed before to
> > proceed with the so called "experimental" registration of the URN:LEX
> > namespace.
>
> Sorry, we've dropped the ball here.  As far as I can tell from reviewing
> the discussion at
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn/current/maillist.html, we have
> consensus to register the namespace based on draft-spinosa-urn-lex-13,
> but we haven't actually notified IANA of that.  Who is it that notifies
> IANA?
>
> Dale
>
>