Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141bis document
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 19 November 2012 16:39 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CD321F86AF for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:39:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.252
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.252 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.108, BAYES_00=-2.599, FRT_ADOBE2=2.455, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UOcJKEkB3iZ6 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:39:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008AB21F8687 for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:39:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fc26so5773112vbb.31 for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:39:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yPFvMj0Vt5AL60S35ycsIq4AWVkt42w0rCR/4sFe3NM=; b=QxJ5gleZQq9bBYMNxq2oBzXAlO9juyDQAMkdQI7G6VbfyV/zwmpwP+e3jxim4vSdJw NSgH0jROUB2hHW/07V/Q9kFbiH9JMc9ZYtg6CFrZ2iiMYm49582NLBmM5xIy6+DZPsrL Ilf8FAqPvmMSIsbsP6fBlwTDjzGXaBFi3kVkOu1J8IAEpG5AORCa1lXF5vVSbU5WCA5K WymlIfDAruVXwMFOgXTKLytw+TuNLde4oWDPJCv+9Db4eZR5clGxC4TzSAUssVi3qHqd HTsT5JC90ihBZdR6eic+VTwtci3eD8ccjjTO/ddK7LUnB+/MfzMZ+vx9+8u3pM/q1wHU kyZg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.161.113 with SMTP id xr17mr18072646veb.3.1353343146981; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:39:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.164.35 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:39:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E3702754D@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
References: <CAAQiQRe+wCBmKfm7up8XY-4RxLnktZiz+nuanprygGcHAYdqAw@mail.gmail.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E36EF2DC4@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <F97E15A0-480C-414B-A4E4-A8F5C2037153@semanticidentity.com> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E3702754D@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 08:39:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMDnKYU9oJN_xMQ8RA5A_0fAz5W=U_J6N0J5Wan4RwXVuw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141bis document
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:39:08 -0000
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote: >> Hi Larry....as we all know, it is impossible to say that _anything_ will be >> persistent (even beyond our lifetimes) in this industry. While I agree that there is no way to say that anything aiming to be persistent will succeed, I do think it is useful to capture the answer to the question: will this identifier ever by reassigned in the normal course of business? There are lots of reasons why you can be wrong in the answer you give, but the answer is useful. This is also, oddly enough, why I think UUID URNs are just fine, even though they do not have an organizational guarantee--the cryptographic guarantee they provide is at least as good as the typical human-managed system. So I can look at one in a system and understand that it is meant to be unique. Just my personal view, of course, Ted
- [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141bis d… Andrew Newton
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… SM
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Barry Leiba
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Svensson, Lars
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Andrew Newton
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Bengt Neiss
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Julian Reschke
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Alfred Hönes
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Larry Masinter
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Renato Iannella
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Larry Masinter
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Ted Hardie
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Larry Masinter
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Ted Hardie
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Keith Moore
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141b… Ted Hardie