Re: [urn] Transition of 2141bis and 3406bis

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Thu, 21 February 2013 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF89F21F89B5 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:34:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kp7opinGJ6Ay for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com (mail-pa0-f45.google.com [209.85.220.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E635A21F8E7A for <urn@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:34:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id kl14so4772981pab.4 for <urn@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:34:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=KE8RDYpFTEW0jpVWEYrag2/H4V+SWRqxQHWt0mGOCUI=; b=gtAlirSnE+o8UZPSpV6dLwNlacO4Rjcn6f3p1FoXzr3GeqyEutZhFk6q4qS5pcGDai 2XhLgrzcRtcFYvsUmWtrc/UTNoORXa20/xz/2tp101XJNvzCcf2hUPkf40s0YDi+WNXL p/8JmXlv9+3Q2ola1YFD3Z47NDwMeuBgtPULou7DpQwaA/XzK2uBuhpy+LKSqi3DQFr+ cejlOjHz0lERxPW3BsMBNXbbZMGa1rsUddTMm2hQHLXDOj2+ixfM3J2S8x9FADhl/E6o hdv1/7AKzQZBIuIAx+GIwFw89g+qutpeXEbEwp4jXD7V4KkSgEKLp+of4Kkp1Yx/qpPw yzbg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.129.9 with SMTP id ns9mr55849752pbb.16.1361460863718; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:34:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.66.139.163 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:34:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [192.149.252.228]
In-Reply-To: <5125C747.2030205@helsinki.fi>
References: <CAAQiQReC-MXOpR4m3UHNJ0KQxHADfO2a4qduVoQC3qy5hHUSxg@mail.gmail.com> <50D40B6F.9050200@helsinki.fi> <5125ACF2.2010205@stpeter.im> <5125C747.2030205@helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:34:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRdhwfbSCVWDoFWooG991B32+t+XjKVHJY3XOP5p_StxzQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
To: Juha Hakala <juha.hakala@helsinki.fi>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15afdb286c7e04d63dcf1e
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmofM+ec4HdF6U524Sxlwxk04dpXvyPiGwaOD+6tRBZ3sypTHkx6VMddVphOCqLKePlIzZG
Cc: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [urn] Transition of 2141bis and 3406bis
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:34:25 -0000

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Juha Hakala <juha.hakala@helsinki.fi>wrote;wrote:

> There are many ways in which service requests can be passed to the URN
> resolution service which will process them. IMHO the most convenient one is
> the query, now that RFC 3986 allows it. When the first set of URN RFCs was
> developed, this was not an option and workaround was developed; alas, DDDS
> as specified in RFC3401 etc. has never really become popular.


I know we've had a lot of conversations about fragments, but I don't think
adding query components has been discussed much here. Are there any
specific objection to adding query to the URN syntax?

-andy