IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [urn] Comments/answers to reasons for changes in PWID URN version 4 - diff version 3 and 4

Eld Zierau <elzi@kb.dk> Mon, 21 January 2019 13:15 UTC

Return-Path: <elzi@kb.dk>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3E9130FB8 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:15:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vDRlN9UxGulU for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:15:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out12.electric.net (smtp-out12.electric.net [89.104.206.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6117B124B0C for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:15:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1glZPr-0000wx-TD by out12c.electric.net with emc1-ok (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <elzi@kb.dk>) id 1glZPs-0001dZ-Uj; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:15:04 -0800
Received: by emcmailer; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:15:04 -0800
Received: from [130.226.226.11] (helo=post.kb.dk) by out12c.electric.net with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <elzi@kb.dk>) id 1glZPr-0000wx-TD; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 05:15:03 -0800
Received: from EXCH-02.kb.dk (unknown [10.5.0.112]) by post.kb.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE9491F57; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:15:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EXCH-02.kb.dk (10.5.0.112) by EXCH-02.kb.dk (10.5.0.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1415.2; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:15:02 +0100
Received: from EXCH-02.kb.dk ([fe80::b595:1a1f:5666:b29]) by EXCH-02.kb.dk ([fe80::b595:1a1f:5666:b29%7]) with mapi id 15.01.1415.002; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:15:02 +0100
From: Eld Zierau <elzi@kb.dk>
To: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>, "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
CC: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Re: [urn] Comments/answers to reasons for changes in PWID URN version 4 - diff version 3 and 4
Thread-Index: AdSuc3Sm32TiMBAVSZKSdHKbD7LiBAC8br3A
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:15:02 +0000
Message-ID: <ecf37bf20f7a4dc584a90ebdda71d435@kb.dk>
References: <0a8299a1afb643abb1466b4b0735c12c@dnb.de>
In-Reply-To: <0a8299a1afb643abb1466b4b0735c12c@dnb.de>
Accept-Language: da-DK, en-US
Content-Language: da-DK
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.226.229.95]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-IP: 130.226.226.11
X-Env-From: elzi@kb.dk
X-Proto: esmtp
X-Revdns: post-03.kb.dk
X-HELO: post.kb.dk
X-TLS:
X-Authenticated_ID:
X-PolicySMART: 10573177
X-Virus-Status: Scanned by VirusSMART (c)
X-Virus-Status: Scanned by VirusSMART (s)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/jP0WknWun-B7w8xnGKUpSJQy9YM>
Subject: Re: [urn] Comments/answers to reasons for changes in PWID URN version 4 - diff version 3 and 4
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:15:11 -0000

Thank you Lars,
Is there any particular area you  think needs approvement?
Best regards, Eld

-----Original Message-----
From: Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de> 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 3:47 PM
To: Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com>; Eld Zierau <elzi@kb.dk>
Cc: urn@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Re: [urn] Comments/answers to reasons for changes in PWID URN version 4 - diff version 3 and 4

Apologies for not commenting on this draft until now...

Version 4 of PWID has matured considerably compared to version 3 and I think it needs at the most one or two more iterations until it's ready for registration.

I find the discussion about an IANA registry for names of web archives very interesting and would support the creation of such a registry. The number of such archives will probably be of manageable size (about the same size as the number of national libraries...).

I also have a number of minor editorial issues but would wait with those until the contents of the draft are more stable.

Best,

Lars

> -----Original Message-----
> From: urn [mailto:urn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dale R. Worley
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 2:02 AM
> To: Eld Zierau <elzi@kb.dk>
> Cc: urn@ietf.org
> Subject: [Marketing Mail] Re: [urn] Comments/answers to reasons for 
> changes in PWID URN version 4 - diff version 3 and 4
> 
> Eld Zierau <elzi@kb.dk> writes:
> > Here is the promised Word file with differences between version 3 
> > and 4
> 
> > [2:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.do
> > cument
> Show Save:PWID_from_V3_to_V4.docx (81kB)]
> 
> Why not just give the URL to the datatracker's history page for the I-D:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pwid-urn-specification/history/
> and the URL for the diff between v3 and v4, in the format that 
> basically everybody in the IETF is familiar with:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-pwid-urn-specification-03&url2
> =draft-pwid-
> urn-specification-04
> 
> Dale
> 
> _______________________________________________
> urn mailing list
> urn@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email