IETF Logo Mail Archive

[urn] Namespace application v3: reso

worley@ariadne.com Mon, 18 January 2021 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498CC3A0C4C for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:42:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.985
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.985 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcastmailservice.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aH5skNluQ9wc for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:42:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EACFC3A0C46 for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:42:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.102]) by resqmta-ch2-03v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id 1Tprl4FDvf72J1ZUOl20JP; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:42:56 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastmailservice.net; s=20180828_2048; t=1610995376; bh=0WdlKs4kVzfECraxij/efZeScqNQSVilvgvzbWPkZ9w=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=S3sj9Zp3AZgfSNcdi56bT6gBtyZVPJ0Li1h2E5OdxNj7aeqLM0XK7TZmHfdfQVCEA yCj+pBrillP6jeJzSYNB365MjQ1uTW2RavQD4fb5uzRSLHGHas0bVDz7ijL9CE7zPo wvov0tBPPAgbUnbBBFgRwfDcF7RFpGtH9FaiF4L+nodaV0AdfS6dBybQpFv7VGadGf B0n7dx/bNm2uXmJ3GZ7nseErTkaOtGiy2tS97reQqwpaJ+W5GZcR9raeImiHwwEiYo /aMZnJOGgLZfEF+FgGFiLC+2M3FefxaTgt0ItjJAXO8P4UtMNTrAsf2kzZsytuhp/i Pru067QRs+gkQ==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4a00:430:222:fbff:fe91:d396]) by resomta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id 1ZU0lQBj7YC651ZU1lNlWD; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:42:45 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0.00;st=legit
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 10IIgWrs027884; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:42:32 -0500
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id 10IIgV2a027881; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:42:31 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: lars.svensson@web.de
Cc: josh@reso.org, sam@reso.org, urn@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <trinity-edd7e603-bc36-4a95-8363-fe6881324e6e-1610639380797@3c-app-webde-bap09> (lars.svensson@web.de)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:42:31 -0500
Message-ID: <87czy2gk88.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/pgxYayFdbNm6h7jiCwwVFBc_38E>
Subject: [urn] Namespace application v3: reso
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:42:59 -0000

As far as I can see, we have consensus to approve the "reso"
application.  What is the next step to implement that?

Dale

v2.19.0 | Report a Bug | By Email