Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141bis document

Alfred Hönes <ah@TR-Sys.de> Thu, 01 November 2012 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <A.Hoenes@TR-Sys.de>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C54B21F854F for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 03:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.26
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.26 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UcBqQp0cjHZk for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 03:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TR-Sys.de (gateway.tr-sys.de [213.178.172.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E594D21F854A for <urn@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 03:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ZEUS.TR-Sys.de by w. with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.37.109.26 $/16.3.2) id AA000944469; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 11:07:49 +0100
Received: (from ah@localhost) by z.TR-Sys.de (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183)/8.7.3) id LAA23456; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 11:07:48 +0100 (MEZ)
From: Alfred =?hp-roman8?B?SM5uZXM=?= <ah@TR-Sys.de>
Message-Id: <201211011007.LAA23456@TR-Sys.de>
To: urn@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 11:07:48 +0100 (MEZ)
X-Mailer: ELM [$Revision: 1.17.214.3 $]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=hp-roman8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [urn] call for comments: an alternative 2141bis document
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 10:10:08 -0000

As noted previously, I have intentionally deferred speaking up
on this matter in detail until *all* the revised WG draft versions
are available, so they can all be properly referred to.

The revised rfc3044bis (URN:ISSN) draft is expected to become
available soon after I-D submission is open again next week.

It doesn't seem proper to me to not seriously take into account
all the dependencies upon draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc2141bis-urn-03
of the rfc3406bis draft and the namespace-specific WG drafts.
Previous responses on this thread do not seem to do this.

So please review the aforementioned drafts -- including the rfc3044bis
draft revision, once available -- *before* making your mind up!

Kind regards,
  Alfred.