Re: [urn] GVAT registration request

+1

Best,

Lars

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: urn [mailto:urn-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Peter Saint-Andre
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. April 2023 17:38
An: Miksa, Tomasz <tomasz.miksa@tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: urn@ietf.org
Betreff: Re: [urn] GVAT registration request

This looks good. I approve.

Peter

On 4/21/23 6:12 AM, Miksa, Tomasz wrote:
> Thanks again for the careful review of our specifications. You helped us improve it.
> 
> I enclose hopefully the final revision. I made the following changes:
> 1. Fixed the notation for the object as suggested by Dale. It is now: 
> 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 / %x2D). I know that it allows a 
> situation in which the object consists of "-" only, which may not be 
> ideal, but I believe it is better to keep the formulation simple, 
> rather than come up with something more complex like 1*(%x41–5A / 
> %x61–7A / %x30–39) (%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 / %x2D)
> 
> 2. Rephrased the Resolution section as suggested by @Juha. It captures very well the gist of what we are up to.
> 
> Apart from this, no other changes were made.
> 
> Cheers
> Tomasz
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars G. Svensson <lars.svensson@web.de>
> Sent: piątek, 21 kwietnia 2023 11:26
> To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>; Dale R. Worley 
> <worley@ariadne.com>; Miksa, Tomasz <tomasz.miksa@tuwien.ac.at>
> Cc: urn@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [urn] GVAT registration request
> 
> Having read the specification, I have no comments and agree with the registration of GVAT as a urn namespace.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Lars
> 
> Am 18.04.2023 um 22:38 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
>> On 4/18/23 12:43 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>>> I have only one remaining comment.  There appears to be a typo:
>>>
>>> "Miksa, Tomasz" <tomasz.miksa@tuwien.ac.at> writes:
>>> ...
>>>> Ad. object
>>>> Yes, we are aware of the lack of German characters. We really 
>>>> intend to ensure no semantics in the identifiers. One change we did 
>>>> was to introduce the "-", to have better overlap with UUID and 
>>>> DOIs, in case any of them is used in the future. Now it is:
>>>> 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 ) %x2D
>>> ...
>>>>       object                 = 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 ) 
>>>> %x2D
>>> ...
>>>
>>> As written, this means one or more alphanumeric characters, then 
>>> always followed by "-".  I assume that the intent is
>>>
>>>        object                 = 1*(%x41–5A / %x61–7A / %x30–39 / 
>>> %x2D
>>> )
>>>
>>> that is, alphanumerics arbitrarily mixed with "-".
>>
>> Good catch, and agreed.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> urn mailing list
>> urn@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn

_______________________________________________
urn mailing list
urn@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn