Re: [usefor] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5537 (4468)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 15 October 2015 20:16 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: usefor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: usefor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABDB1A01C6 for <usefor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j9K2KGrQFTaC for <usefor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x236.google.com (mail-vk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 081241A020A for <usefor@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vkex70 with SMTP id x70so49443993vke.3 for <usefor@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NJALm6641rK2A9JwYZKAicxPQ9rk13bqxl5BajkigTQ=; b=jbUL82zBmC2W7ro/nY55kC47Doj6VOun93jRglO5fAOYBuLSfHi/SXuFSmB2Vm7Tcj 0pwYF4TdviYm54BQ/w4dGWOKlEJQt0pHcei77vdjtGnAYEsVQG4+Q8rbG0F3fD1eruOn RYmVJPpIj/MPKFwLcxAa3653UqAN6CWyBN0U/PgL5S9ERa8Vkwnm658zXlOlbmt9SFfX QVQpmSw7xwc5NyRmjExKCBQzs8imw5rTZqgkPA6KzGCf2Ba0KFr5xM3cNVrSphtKbzQG TTIf+Z6nlR0v5WIxl5PNE83TD5JGGKzCqvK6a9lMF6z2sv9N9Kcd2BgIpwXpBPH3dhVV I6/w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.132.79 with SMTP id g76mr7553220vkd.40.1444940184105; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.31.54.65 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <562006A3.9080500@trigofacile.com>
References: <20150908203158.449C0180207@rfc-editor.org> <561E8E75.5080903@alvestrand.no> <CALaySJLzTT7sqP5AsUvGX+2jp8c3Jzx1OmrJPnUK4xvSoTQrgg@mail.gmail.com> <561EA86C.70309@trigofacile.com> <op.x6ihwuyp6hl8nm@localhost> <CALaySJJhuBjA7GOYWwif3FHuX-GEmiayoEJAPkkhksVMhJRsyg@mail.gmail.com> <561F4A7B.60406@alvestrand.no> <562006A3.9080500@trigofacile.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:16:23 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: w98T47tCyOmZsl0Q9TfRkh3YeE0
Message-ID: <CALaySJK4qOSMMWNUeAeCV=pqFQN7_m8+njap-bXe3XHpurjA-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: =?UTF-8?B?SnVsaWVuIMOJTElF?= <julien@trigofacile.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/usefor/5lVCmK5TmJG4fx64V-Ks0stB96Y>
Cc: Charles Lindsey <chl@clerew.man.ac.uk>, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, usefor@ietf.org, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Russ Allbery <eagle@eyrie.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [usefor] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5537 (4468)
X-BeenThere: usefor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of usefor issues." <usefor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/usefor>, <mailto:usefor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/usefor/>
List-Post: <mailto:usefor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:usefor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/usefor>, <mailto:usefor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:16:26 -0000

> Would it be possible to update the old <ietf-usefor@imc.org> address used to
> the current <usefor@ietf.org> address?  (And if possible, update all imc.org
> addresses to ietf.org in the contacts of the RFC Editor.)
> Maybe it is the reason of the lack of these mails in the archives. Another
> possibility would be that the list is in the Cc: recipients instead of To:.

Yes, this has come up before.  I will talk with the RFC Editor folks
at the upcoming Yokohama IETF meeting (2.5 weeks hence) and see if
there's a reasonable way for us to make contact information more up to
date.  We all know what to do in a specific case, but it's quite
challenging to handle it in general.

Barry