Re: [Uta] **SPAM** Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: (with COMMENT)

Binu Ramakrishnan <rbinu@oath.com> Thu, 19 April 2018 03:41 UTC

Return-Path: <rbinu@oath.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2475712895E for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oath.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ojgZhAeCZgoo for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:41:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A93AE128959 for <uta@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id h11-v6so3598394oic.3 for <uta@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oath.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lq/00mMC/yeQwTA7Ig9hFQRQ+oMx5WLjMkcs0OzLXQs=; b=VUU5d+RmaxndidbzgDLrkbgH8QuAZ012QT+gyIRsCzmGIJONXsiF2vwTe0ippmZybb lhMbGXCXEw3HVHrIlWqjG4IVLpHBjPJkS8ZTv+j2kV+MA4D4/9vkAFcq7eiXfBjntKFY JIe+qvLeun8hwH1t0KgjEJ6cW4+tAl8BnBgdEyO07PVm6ABwIp0coFpkbRGy+afNAdfo k/8OZH1td2z4WvW7Q0TNLaOPyT8lZ0yIh+b77skcgvoniQKe1RafwqNtdYTB/i11zoez DKeLSey1O89tZLoeC66dJEkpWCWoJeJDGV5Vl4BKTl89mErTarAw2MG+4AyryObE+UB3 C9rQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lq/00mMC/yeQwTA7Ig9hFQRQ+oMx5WLjMkcs0OzLXQs=; b=S72herjyZmzpdsWluCrhrZRA4eCiDGAg5XYI79lqJ8FiY/fzuId22hetpJ3NXzQyd6 U5ZmhgyI0iJ21mm3iAac/QrF+OyBLzQe2z/xqXtata6c5aGt+HUWDGm0wlGWyrZu5zeR qiPXGo2gn72XYSvHxIeLSXItIl2pRbRjW61l/2n1X6Fmxc73jNXIK6el01AB9ByEID/e sVsAwbOi0gpb6K8KGnz8QgU0BQ/9sQzXU9gZceXO4jswzllhOixLIslHt0HGDcm/6uEb 4X4YvRBc9GUx2NzNuD86sPA7/LWbds477npXG9mqOEutc5X/1WKLXhaHkgGnw+nvNY7z OXnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tArlC6WuV47mn9JR1wlLyP2a7Yd1RZfiMwtmDM4onjHBJXiD48M uYemt+g5Y7GAXA+41lXJAh/+OGHLtSX8B6WG0QZTIg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+g8SNpC2UTHYNSr6KsDGaq6FgtJ/LldeUuSqmlaim6C/YrYQUNhEXJ7khqP2xHKB4EOKYpaqcDfoLteWdVZKM=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:f007:: with SMTP id o7-v6mr2833640oih.324.1524109278936; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:1877:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:41:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <152405697627.31745.6276058831150289137.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <152405697627.31745.6276058831150289137.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Binu Ramakrishnan <rbinu@oath.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:41:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOLH8uyk2Dxv9V0QaVdMfX_nME0gG_mvfHAR+gBOwCfSVwGqng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt@ietf.org, Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>, Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>, uta-chairs@ietf.org, uta@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002bad1c056a2b589c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/12aOqAZagN9y4FigX_kR-WL-t60>
Subject: Re: [Uta] **SPAM** Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 03:41:23 -0000

Thank you Mirja.

'rua' is defined in Section 3 (Reporting Policy). Would that be sufficient?
In fact "Aggregate report URI" is borrowed from DMARC.

-binu

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 6:09 AM, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
wrote:

> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Maybe add "Aggregate report URI (rua)" to the terminology section.
>
>
>