IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Adoption of draft-rsalz-use-san

Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Mon, 15 March 2021 23:22 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657D53A128C for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sunet.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ok8VSVu2mpR2 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 630003A1288 for <uta@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id p7so57809443eju.6 for <uta@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sunet.se; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NZmb4Kq1hUZQD3xycz1f/BUxaV7ojKQxMBgq3SqBqsI=; b=O0Cp/TXJLRq57Ynlt9QCo6TgHM+VRoEY2+SIbzc/i6fFvkh0I7JYzvEejMBddpqc9A YnjGDEfZHTtvm42BHG5QWzBlNcuSmg35dYE/Zi1/MbLCifn7neK1JLE8Lsv8e4PYifTd uNO6vpNLu6CVhreWZJX3IHzjhSxfhIvWjDCt0doIEEGaIANbJOCv5c8J9Lg/cV4q3V2L X2A9t9SNzNdKYUbPZWQ0rfvxjf9074nidPJCeLr0vZi2+KhSf6luf8c7yvQfwHaWhoHW /NoEgOD7kgXIQajKuFyFGuafHYFwjLoRohax8vk/or4gOWbpSCGXKXj8HdP1mJZNHKn+ 6D2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NZmb4Kq1hUZQD3xycz1f/BUxaV7ojKQxMBgq3SqBqsI=; b=P9cUiWq6BIkTnvz1weFLgSwync1FAMZSXzkNfjly/1At90Tz+cs67wTJuVKAreeXAD SG7jJjYUg7tVp6WYyqj8kdxbwofzlMF/ilAWWu+/N4oKByElkEoOda8f+vIhR8qLAQGU aIkqFfS/cEp8F/GbEGqwXosVcryFOMmh7wjR9SlWv5N4Bsa316Ema7hHRIUffDz1QK7D 6iam8mngqXluNOciPH6Qztnb/V6jt3cNzqYZhhTHTkoeOdsBbTifkL3isbeaHXKmr2/C k20VlkToTFg5+bE+ErL1d5dSOp07B9sI8q24vtPgIY/AceDSxKesAL6b8UZY+8VeKAE8 Pwbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533YPeESyxaTRSFAx3WsklIrHCHI0qqZ0Qz4qRn0GAh4LjbYSbTZ bIGxTxvLFfXNf9cw4a8wSTvoZA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4TTRwk3p6dl9tL6ZRKQzcm0dqaR26MKBIUdE/jjdeAol6JdzpyWZp6LAYN2aphkawCgbeDQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3e8a:: with SMTP id hs10mr26705431ejc.267.1615850530594; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.10.50] ([192.36.125.12]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m7sm8771308edp.81.2021.03.15.16.22.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, Valery Smyslov <smyslov.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>, "uta-chairs@ietf.org" <uta-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <004201d718e1$007959a0$016c0ce0$@gmail.com> <CAFewVt7qE=nmxCMhkW_y0gwt=4Vk_Ov2bbVCm-yFqfNx7unckA@mail.gmail.com> <9B34C68D-E390-40DA-BF19-29F98BEF0C33@akamai.com>
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
Message-ID: <d97e7269-4ee1-aa78-04a7-5292c90b4a29@sunet.se>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 00:22:09 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9B34C68D-E390-40DA-BF19-29F98BEF0C33@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/5yLScr2w33WA08Pvxgg_EeBrLUg>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Adoption of draft-rsalz-use-san
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 23:22:19 -0000

On 2021-03-15 15:56, Salz, Rich wrote:
> *>* I think it would be much better to rewrite RFC 6125 with all the patches applied, and then have that new document obsolete RFC 6125 instead of updating it.
> 
>  
> 
> I took another look at 6125 and I am happy to put up a draft if the WG prefers that approach.
> 

That is still a possible outcome of a WG draft - nothing forces us to publish as a separate doc.

	Cheers Leif

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email