Re: [Uta] Comments on draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-03

Please post a revised draft with these changes sooner rather than later.
Thanks.

				Ned

> Sounds like we go back to underscore-prefixed. Thanks for the feedback
> John.

> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:55 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> > In article <813df83a-841e-4e6a-e3a1-f2852b20ddbc@bluepopcorn.net> you
> > write:
> > >3.1. MTA-STS TXT records
> > >
> > >There is no IANA registry for reserved hostnames, which is why protocols
> > >like SPF store their policies at the domain itself.
> >
> > Urrgh.  SPF is as far as I know the only protocol published by the
> > IETF that stores policies at the unprefixed hostname, and that is
> > widely agreed to be a mistake.  DKIM and DMARC use prefixes.
> >
> > There's the somewhat separate issue that if the prefixed name has to
> > be a hostname so it can be used in a URI, it can't contain an
> > underscore.
> >
> > R's,
> > John
> >
> > PS: Dave Crocker and I have been working on a prefix registry, but
> > it's a thankless task.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Uta mailing list
> > Uta@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
> >