Re: [Uta] Modular vs. modp
Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Fri, 20 February 2015 20:55 UTC
Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672901A87B0 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:55:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q4iFrHCDl2Vv for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com (mail-ie0-f174.google.com [209.85.223.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D37FB1A006F for <uta@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:55:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iecrp18 with SMTP id rp18so10811145iec.9 for <uta@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:55:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hp5U0I0/HwBx9tgtIKOK2nENgAhWaboe7e7jiPr339I=; b=Nu838pKY/goCsMBKns3pQcnHIGGZjbSd2j+K5Qm6aQWBxe3/aA0fczH5fjj6wXoNRZ GiTBDZ3y6F2GdgmVkVY+Df5Z0ZtutzEYBmdNk02QQ4KJbqP/A0vqm6WsHtnLrPRZmZRm 9a9VI9SLWsAk2ZnzaGQvlSGqOyOxFzTrr6kbJLQEPe3qypcdL62f42lpxBB622AoeNnA hc5C2E1e57evUM/1F64zshn74HgQrSnCIsOzsOtvBYAGdOKHPhA9Erkx+om5V+CZnzP3 jeJ8cMaqop36j6n1+ivYm/Y11GeEaF4IpWV75CwRpsOtRbiO0snfRDmeZ6wwTcQbH3an BvLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl8MIumCE1Zgjkrwfcj389WPAifi4LTW14CxtaJnlm/h5qh6W13oVKQDX6N4+4v5tFPtgnn
X-Received: by 10.50.109.228 with SMTP id hv4mr1017893igb.45.1424465754271; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:55:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local (c-73-34-202-214.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [73.34.202.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yq1sm1596648igb.21.2015.02.20.12.55.53 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 12:55:53 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54E79F58.5070502@andyet.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 13:55:52 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: uta@ietf.org
References: <20150219033433.10815.25308.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <54E56454.7080307@andyet.net> <20150220065017.GU1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <20150220205253.GD1260@mournblade.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150220205253.GD1260@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/CglJkOx-vjbUkbXRd8ICO_3hHvE>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Modular vs. modp
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 20:55:56 -0000
On 2/20/15 1:52 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 06:50:17AM +0000, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > [ Top post: So should the title and text of 4.4 be changed? ] Well, modp is, I assume, short for Modular Exponentiation so the RFC Editor is going to ask us to spell it out on first use anyway. Personally, this is not a hill to die on for me... Peter
- [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-t… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Pete Resnick
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Pete Resnick
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Brian Smith
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Brian Smith
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Leif Johansson
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Ralph Holz
- Re: [Uta] Modular vs. modp Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Pete Resnick
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
- [Uta] Modular vs. modp (was: Richard Barnes' Disc… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Leif Johansson
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Leif Johansson
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Peter Saint-Andre - &yet
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Pete Resnick
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… t.p.
- Re: [Uta] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-u… Pete Resnick