Re: [Uta] Draft UTA agenda for IETF 114
Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net> Tue, 19 July 2022 16:09 UTC
Return-Path: <valery@smyslov.net>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2221C14F743; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.809
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.809 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=smyslov.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hMMShFDmgPCY; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from direct.host-care.com (direct.host-care.com [198.136.54.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27C25C157901; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smyslov.net ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=iHQyQqoHocQRGqHk1/wLlyxwXHIsusVseMtl97xpZaU=; b=hZ/J03kyKZ42SWYsMNP+o6C65X 7JydKSJmPGlmmlTDCjo5HDODA6vvj2D38JaQgqNLgM4JwkrxksB/ZWC1qJJIUw0AkIOxYcJIQ77wf lQyMx3yQn7/JqVfTcCrSzfTt9tY62M/LlPisAs7uWpwX638mo0XAdqFwDycC4mEPu30CvXzcFIMDn 6I+guU5zuGz18e829Tw4FG5H1Ps7VrYaTiVe3xVT45JjddzOGHSwVPIJNBf2KmC9sST/+ymyfOhs7 4Sd7nb+MwNFCjr/pSwqYPUqN1Bsx/0wFVAWWAFx0v6ASf0WepISSUXqIIqCSDQ/jFvMzb5nslrrGW L9Mtj5yg==;
Received: from [93.188.44.204] (port=55459 helo=buildpc) by direct.host-care.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <valery@smyslov.net>) id 1oDpmx-0003RK-LW; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:09:35 -0400
From: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
To: "'Salz, Rich'" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, uta@ietf.org
Cc: uta-chairs@ietf.org, 'Francesca Palombini' <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 19:09:32 +0300
Message-ID: <054701d89b89$f0b9c180$d22d4480$@smyslov.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdibiXVwU2ZBUm6bStaWA14gASlXyg==
Content-Language: ru
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - direct.host-care.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - smyslov.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: direct.host-care.com: authenticated_id: valery@smyslov.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: direct.host-care.com: valery@smyslov.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/Gu5MC6d-R4Hynfn_ftkrwH_es4I>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Draft UTA agenda for IETF 114
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 16:09:43 -0000
Hi Rich, > > 5 min. Administrativia (zulip scribes, note takers), Note Well, Agenda bashing > (chairs) > > Can you include 6125bis here? A new draft was posted before the deadline addressing the final WGLC > issues. Sure. I also think that we can discuss an issue of 6125bis scope - whether to include non-domain names there. From the input in the ML received so far it's difficult to draw a consensus. Regards, Valery. > _______________________________________________ > Uta mailing list > Uta@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
- Re: [Uta] Draft UTA agenda for IETF 114 Valery Smyslov
- Re: [Uta] Draft UTA agenda for IETF 114 Valery Smyslov