[Uta] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-require-tls-09: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 02 August 2019 22:06 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-uta-smtp-require-tls@ietf.org, Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>, uta-chairs@ietf.org, valery@smyslov.net, uta@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <156478360827.20869.9871138241170740997.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:06:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/M0Ys8_UUBL5J5LBs-D5BBZ-s-7I>
Subject: [Uta] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-require-tls-09: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-smtp-require-tls-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-smtp-require-tls/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for resolving my Discuss points!

I do think the added text in Section 4.2.1 about DNS-ID/CN-ID should
probably be clarified that it only applies to the RFC 6125 procedures and
not the RFC 7672 ones.

[Uta] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
Re: [Uta] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-… Jim Fenton
Re: [Uta] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-… Benjamin Kaduk