IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: (with DISCUSS)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 10 May 2018 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116831243FE; Thu, 10 May 2018 08:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.878
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.878 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id at0P_AjgIgfC; Thu, 10 May 2018 08:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7AB11241FC; Thu, 10 May 2018 08:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Orochi.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w4AF0hRo086627 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 10 May 2018 10:00:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Orochi.local
To: Daniel Margolis <dmargolis@google.com>
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts@ietf.org, uta@ietf.org, uta-chairs@ietf.org, Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
References: <152584853457.2745.6217476375548929060.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CANtKdUf-gXoYci3hkB55m6BRkAiFKkjjm=GO+UxACgLMDuArnw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <d7c5589a-b9a2-da37-3447-cd2cb969abfc@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 10:00:38 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANtKdUf-gXoYci3hkB55m6BRkAiFKkjjm=GO+UxACgLMDuArnw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------D090195F0FBE9454194C14A7"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/Rqvj_5vXIKq3FOLQnGt2kmjOELI>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 15:00:57 -0000

Thanks! Ping me when the revised version of TLSRPT is in the draft 
repository, and I'll clear this DISCUSS.

/a

On 5/10/18 09:56, Daniel Margolis wrote:
> Thanks. We (as you may know) renamed "report" mode to "testing" mode 
> late in the review process. I have fixed the errors in TLSRPT to be 
> consistent with MTA-STS in our working draft.
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:49 AM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com 
> <mailto:adam@nostrum.com>> wrote:
>
>     Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
>     draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: Discuss
>
>     When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>     email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
>     this
>     introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>     Please refer to
>     https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>     for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
>     The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts/
>
>
>
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     DISCUSS:
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     Thanks to everyone who contributed to this document. I intend to
>     ballot "yes,"
>     once the following issue has been resolved:
>
>     This document defines three modes: "enforce", "testing", and
>     "none". It is
>     intended to work in conjunction with draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt,
>     which shows the
>     use of "mode: report" in all of its examples.
>
>     On a quick survey of hosts I can quickly find publishing MTA-STS
>     records, I
>     find:
>
>     version: STSv1
>     mode: testing
>     mx: aspmx.l.google.com <http://aspmx.l.google.com>
>     mx: .aspmx.l.google.com <http://aspmx.l.google.com>
>     max_age: 86400
>
>     version: STSv1
>     mode: report
>     mx: mx00.emig.gmx.net <http://mx00.emig.gmx.net>
>     mx: mx01.emig.gmx.net <http://mx01.emig.gmx.net>
>     max_age: 604800
>
>     version: STSv1
>     mode: report
>     mx: mx1.comcast.net <http://mx1.comcast.net>
>     mx: mx2.comcast.net <http://mx2.comcast.net>
>     max_age: 2592000
>
>     version: STSv1
>     mode: report
>     mx: *.am0.yahoodns.net <http://am0.yahoodns.net>
>     max_age: 86400
>
>     The implementation confusion here appears to be real. Please
>     ensure that
>     draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt and draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts agree about
>     valid values
>     for the "mode" parameter.
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Uta mailing list
>     Uta@ietf.org <mailto:Uta@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email