IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: (with DISCUSS)

Daniel Margolis <dmargolis@google.com> Thu, 10 May 2018 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <dmargolis@google.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC011243FE for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2018 07:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -18.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hT9H3lgouCPi for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2018 07:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18175124205 for <uta@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2018 07:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id e12-v6so3325982iob.8 for <uta@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2018 07:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kZOh0XuvmQXbYb1maY+YtStL4wESuPGpLK7yt/CGTjs=; b=CDuPo11HMz1+OpilAOR2pr0ylhUkhgnCdNd1l8caoT085fWl0DA6vAyvhz1JZX81oJ Yp0jNGVDZK0oAs0Hyh9mz+DAYzUVE0EszOl6r4spo14MNLMJafS/Co0NWJmg69uZ01rE Pzx36GP99t6ZFFQzn4JPYBDpiNj/a7eBKFzdJXabKkXsrzrg7kVvlJvMjy/H7OMcOuvV pbqhJvEx/L+xnh1ygELE53HrRSZ8gDPh4lPeitd+C0tEYnp5CoKr6ULB0R7TtjrKwVsj HS9bdxpTc/MWPA+jD385mRUB//44e6/G6b0Bkc6Z6xsbOq97t+usqBHJv0mNc5ddk7jx XRXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kZOh0XuvmQXbYb1maY+YtStL4wESuPGpLK7yt/CGTjs=; b=uR49NkxreU9U8Ba65+ABnKjSpP5Mf4iFkscA9VdXi9Rc50UcZ8jkW8bApBL9lAavZ4 dbgAb8LJKpvydzcEUFsb1M8AWxJLQFBSoHiylM9RUuhn7u3EgeBr5n/LMTsyKgYL0Y2P zPgeawMpi3++n5SZEssczDkaEoqeW9VPNIIF+1u6TiCat2MqwCFFzNcOM9H8AvahRNSP h2hG/gNrqBPjxOocGhk5M/5RXXgwmZPQECQZD+X4hvMl78EuJv07tBvCCmGo3+nvlhLI WNWfr4ERWmVcKNb1vFfNLai1kP27tyYzxodznMtrrlrqoPJ1kWEB01jQPx5AnMDg0eAe OL7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwe9YDlr1wqAsbJGNdyRARA2QuLHkJLAdA7LSA91raD8CBgCsImc TlK36uMgqjEBkc5oz06HXYSlvt8bjxeiB2Rz3NoHifZN
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqeKrJkiorK3QlrYoqOW3+VXR+weeb8DtpNo7SctpN0Ye4q+pWZ/apq7x5J37wy9a4+nvb51DvIu7ZejcTYTog=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:c741:: with SMTP id x62-v6mr1755305iof.97.1525964230975; Thu, 10 May 2018 07:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <152584853457.2745.6217476375548929060.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <152584853457.2745.6217476375548929060.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Daniel Margolis <dmargolis@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 16:56:56 +0200
Message-ID: <CANtKdUf-gXoYci3hkB55m6BRkAiFKkjjm=GO+UxACgLMDuArnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: adam@nostrum.com
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts@ietf.org, uta@ietf.org, uta-chairs@ietf.org, Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="000000000000f7b007056bdb3bf3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/T_DA2--tfH8skcSFGxZGvMt8_Ts>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 14:57:15 -0000

Thanks. We (as you may know) renamed "report" mode to "testing" mode late
in the review process. I have fixed the errors in TLSRPT to be consistent
with MTA-STS in our working draft.

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:49 AM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: Discuss
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this document. I intend to ballot
> "yes,"
> once the following issue has been resolved:
>
> This document defines three modes: "enforce", "testing", and "none". It is
> intended to work in conjunction with draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt, which
> shows the
> use of "mode: report" in all of its examples.
>
> On a quick survey of hosts I can quickly find publishing MTA-STS records, I
> find:
>
> version: STSv1
> mode: testing
> mx: aspmx.l.google.com
> mx: .aspmx.l.google.com
> max_age: 86400
>
> version: STSv1
> mode: report
> mx: mx00.emig.gmx.net
> mx: mx01.emig.gmx.net
> max_age: 604800
>
> version: STSv1
> mode: report
> mx: mx1.comcast.net
> mx: mx2.comcast.net
> max_age: 2592000
>
> version: STSv1
> mode: report
> mx: *.am0.yahoodns.net
> max_age: 86400
>
> The implementation confusion here appears to be real. Please ensure that
> draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt and draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts agree about valid
> values
> for the "mode" parameter.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Uta mailing list
> Uta@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email