IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] smtp-sts-04 JSON

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 25 April 2017 12:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6432412EC6B for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r82rSshJn9wl for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD1CD12EB32 for <uta@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 05:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v3PCRZPS019403 for <uta@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:31:27 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=tTyz2pfk/UDcESNvZruVNv2eHq8fC2kUlRoOwLHFca8=; b=hlXBd1hM9Dzrwn89hNUYdAa5XmhdDmP11WEr5HQHUtVDFPHZdeoov1meELPgf4p9K2wU soDWrmetE5Y6RUwVdg6oHD2mhz+YimNfnaNT729VscVe2aaDZeD0J8rs/0WzeGhXiUd3 GdDdfu5AL4W8Ft9OlKAgt+Yc1HiOyyFvcKP5fCSxldgtzcOaMua9T/VgtNQI3+irba5q gZHBeJ2r7KaNJJtxlq0Y5eOtjcn0QlKk+EpBO5f0t/eiFxu3oRgV5B9YTGPZ0FWSF30E 2PwqIx2JHsTVdWA90HdQlfJm3/9vFAkheaD0AKPNh1E4Zo/P0owu0/8BkxC175zCJKV2 cQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (a184-51-33-18.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2a22q19rds-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <uta@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:31:27 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v3PCV1Z4028220 for <uta@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:31:26 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2a02gvm9ah-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <uta@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:31:26 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:31:25 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:31:24 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Uta] smtp-sts-04 JSON
Thread-Index: AQHSu91/8Hbw5ZA8kUC6IhF1mlTclaHTKzAAgAI15gCAAARVAIAAXNeAgAAQO4CAADVVAA==
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:31:24 +0000
Message-ID: <13bc4a95d8a44bb8a40a0fbb75eb6221@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <52dde16a-a3bb-5844-7daa-a349def85049@wizmail.org> <80676A32-78CB-4FFA-AEE4-94DA95102B98@dukhovni.org> <a2a6e5f5-ff3b-272b-abda-b49fe23a485d@wizmail.org> <605FE793-3D82-4C4F-9F93-D50DF4320DF5@dukhovni.org> <9402ac0a4990432f994656ddaf94b9e2@COPDCEX19.cable.comcast.com> <CE55E42E-9845-46A6-B0AA-F56CE56F2936@dukhovni.org> <CANtKdUevHbQaUga2=X0tFy4K=po=DL=pKUn-2KZQgRUPTtYAig@mail.gmail.com> <DE3A2AC6-63C0-4C17-9D9E-BF9CB2B3A289@dukhovni.org> <CANtKdUer3CSruZRf-mXp+yvMKY_kCTaQ1vyZGVenNgVf5a9T2g@mail.gmail.com> <907547420.8067868.1493073246224@mail.yahoo.com> <271D533C-7C48-438C-8BBE-0EEC0DFB92DF@dukhovni.org> <1706958889.8319848.1493094113668@mail.yahoo.com> <3BFAA188-A456-4159-B529-1CB1EFA4AAA5@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <3BFAA188-A456-4159-B529-1CB1EFA4AAA5@dukhovni.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.199]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-04-25_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1704250226
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-04-25_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1704250225
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/df3bk8XTZe0f8gj3Eh1RpjSfeBo>
Subject: Re: [Uta] smtp-sts-04 JSON
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:31:31 -0000

> > Wondering why IETF doesn't have a RFC doc for kv pair syntax.
> 
> There's no reason for an RFC to describe trivial lists of pairs.

Sure there is, because folks will want whitespace, want to linearize it, support Unicode, etc.

The MIME parameter lists, maybe?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email