Re: [Uta] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-05

Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net> Wed, 09 March 2022 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <valery@smyslov.net>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B9C3A1872; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 23:45:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=smyslov.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wQnOEfaZ327g; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 23:45:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from direct.host-care.com (direct.host-care.com [198.136.54.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BAA33A1876; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 23:45:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smyslov.net ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qWUhS8yTYCWnuj7BPM9al7SYku60LspD5pb1q9Aq6cI=; b=gcNlIhf9zEx13JluY5UhBwN0xK XNZfVxKDOVOsGjmyyvci21XackSL0AIJkmA/3Cs6M89NpA/nUuOJsgwhx4d0V+Hk75nXZkedXS+GU XkMZdjuGybzjw9NcxRXlH2atNgnNP8/SuOGu3vmTcRA10B/M3phn+gRDQRXyjGnCvpiLey8+IaXWr gHpyvYpVyRTHkkgkRbf0nHroqaRw2ScaDIxorbONtQjOhgpcfydFjldg616uYrPAd5J8O5Lgmph9w 1QoNEvcu4e/CKCURfYnEULbU/Q+Oyh4fu+sGj/czWZiz2bN6GlTX0KPdiHvULG8S+jhw6bNNNdDPE CEDvGhVQ==;
Received: from [93.188.44.204] (port=49446 helo=buildpc) by direct.host-care.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <valery@smyslov.net>) id 1nRr0s-0001Wo-VN; Wed, 09 Mar 2022 02:45:39 -0500
From: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
To: uta@ietf.org, draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis@ietf.org
Cc: 'Leif Johansson' <leifj@mnt.se>, uta-chairs@ietf.org
References: <021b01d82197$6cf5dc60$46e19520$@smyslov.net>
In-Reply-To: <021b01d82197$6cf5dc60$46e19520$@smyslov.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 10:45:37 +0300
Message-ID: <086b01d83389$acd7ce70$06876b50$@smyslov.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJIIFm40BBgR/zB5e/OWNga4qNHd6vW0Ulw
Content-Language: ru
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - direct.host-care.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - smyslov.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: direct.host-care.com: authenticated_id: valery@smyslov.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: direct.host-care.com: valery@smyslov.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/ebZorVQyYsisY2CaN9uoWq5mfu0>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Second WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-05
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 07:45:49 -0000

Hi,

the WGLC period is over. Although not many comments were received,
nobody expressed any concerns about the document. We believe
this is an indication of WG consensus. 

Regards,
Leif & Valery.

> Hi,
> 
> after some discussion the chairs decided to issue a second WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis.
> The draft is an important one and it has received a significant number of changes
> as result of the first WGLC. Despite the fact that many of them were discussed on the mailing list,
> we'd like to have more explicit confirmation that people are happy with the
> way the concerns revealed in the first WGLC were addressed.
> 
> This message starts a second Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-05:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis/
> 
> The WGLC will last for two weeks and will end on March the 1st.
> Please send your comments to the list before this date, even
> if you only want to say: "Hey, the draft is OK".
> 
> Regards,
> Leif & Valery.