IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] review of specs that cite RFC 6125

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 21 March 2022 09:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77D43A1905 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 02:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FT593GFdm1IN for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 02:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C64C33A100F for <uta@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 02:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with ESMTP id 22L88jva019278; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:09:20 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=y32Bg4fLjFSIOqoZEqtgc6HMtkULdOJdRrMQhz+aXu0=; b=VV1jhNS+sRsinBjlAdDt48TdU1Pa1VS89DB3kJBE0iJA27ahBzrxOfCRm36R5rY7B/73 8Ks5y2FG4kS7PnYPoqt3AwaPbxUMN0qxXn2O6o8ODvbnyvY97VUutIdkqbRtxODv/abL ouhBPjvVb/9Af3QWoVfo6GS4jBXvFOYYal77gr3e7xftIJt4twFJrtBNuO7Ul6pYjBAA k6gsh4AgobkR/ZIdbkQhPZm0pwwhRJR0VoLTuL3md938/rckucKvjw0Onztg+V/PKycz HcrZa0W9ZnzQV9Tu/XSf1Rt3LWQW4HE66cucnoRcff8NeukX9GX80OMxU87xQNuINvrZ iA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ew7k8asgb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:09:20 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 22L95rfq009614; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 05:09:19 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.91.27]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3ewagy2yct-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 05:09:19 -0400
Received: from usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) by usma1ex-dag4mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.2.922.27; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 05:09:18 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.32; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 05:09:18 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.033; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 05:09:18 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Uta] review of specs that cite RFC 6125
Thread-Index: AQHYPNNymuDOlVKnMkG8uauW9mqZsKzJjQYA
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:09:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CBA774E9-A6C0-4CF8-B9A4-AC24F8C4E3CA@akamai.com>
References: <754d9043-7d28-7397-2c35-8484f0dfecaa@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <754d9043-7d28-7397-2c35-8484f0dfecaa@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.59.22031300
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <12195C617E72F049A9E1ED407553AD5A@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.425, 18.0.850 definitions=2022-03-21_04:2022-03-15, 2022-03-21 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=983 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2203210059
X-Proofpoint-GUID: kwDw5HPyC7r2oXKiFh29Uu-LRu7w9ECm
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: kwDw5HPyC7r2oXKiFh29Uu-LRu7w9ECm
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.850,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-03-21_03,2022-03-15_01,2022-02-23_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=978 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2203210060
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/iyxF3WhovDuaCaSjOrLj_e8R3Sk>
Subject: Re: [Uta] review of specs that cite RFC 6125
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:09:30 -0000

>    * RFC 8314 discusses pinned certificates and points to RFC 6125 for 
    further discussion about pinning; although we're removing this text from 
    6125bis, the pointer to RFC 6125 will remain valid.

It's not completely removed, but it has fallen out of favor :)  There's still text, but it’s just one paragraph at the end of Sec 6.5, and I think 8314 is still okay to ref 6125/6125bis.

By the way, this was an amazing effort; thanks!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email