Re: [Uta] draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-04 Review

Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org> Sun, 23 April 2017 11:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jgh@wizmail.org>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B72126CC7 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 04:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id auIOEND0wiBa for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 04:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wizmail.org (wizmail.org [IPv6:2a00:1940:107::2:0:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7C961200FC for <uta@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 04:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2a00:b900:109e:0:c5d6:c61b:f5e0:b51f] (helo=lap.dom.ain) by wizmail.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89_RC100) id 1d2FP1-0002mb-CZ (return-path <jgh@wizmail.org>); Sun, 23 Apr 2017 11:10:03 +0000
To: uta@ietf.org, "exim-dev@exim.org" <exim-dev@exim.org>
References: <2DB01F3A9898AE41BB3266315D9FDA2704903D88@S-DC-ESTE03-B.net1.cec.eu.int> <CANtKdUe3CS3A_czWURR_h9Z0r803sX-MQMZOMHioZJnCaauEWw@mail.gmail.com> <5c361c89-907b-ff65-8a11-8df08e0e46af@isode.com> <CANtKdUd2cu3BntMDPWiL-WKiDn1YyUMQm6bakMw++s9F8=65LA@mail.gmail.com> <5C69D23D-9C3E-45EA-98C7-862C3916F5B2@dukhovni.org>
From: Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
Message-ID: <1dff6643-83dd-ae6f-e513-b6e25c0dfd2b@wizmail.org>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 12:10:01 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5C69D23D-9C3E-45EA-98C7-862C3916F5B2@dukhovni.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Pcms-Received-Sender: [2a00:b900:109e:0:c5d6:c61b:f5e0:b51f] (helo=lap.dom.ain) with esmtpsa
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/kxZM5qzPOvAsGFnR06GOhl4YAjM>
Subject: Re: [Uta] draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-04 Review
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 11:10:09 -0000

On 23/04/17 02:31, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Exim appears to have OCSP support, but last time I looked at the code, it seemed to
> be going through the motions, but not actually validating the OCSP response correctly.

Perhaps you could raise specific bugs?
-- 
Cheers,
  Jeremy