IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-09

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Sat, 30 July 2022 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE56BC157B45; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 09:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.129
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.129 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=stpeter.im header.b=Ykc5QJDK; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=L6VQoCAw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bl8bUF8kx63f; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 09:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB5DFC157B43; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 09:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5965C00E7; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 12:10:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 30 Jul 2022 12:10:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stpeter.im; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1659197423; x= 1659283823; bh=AgyV31CTrmdKtihH7ifR0aTHpXmvycUi80pO4tXH1QE=; b=Y kc5QJDKCv+WCuIxjR9V2FEP1GuIj1kMmxGIMXh3Jz4R8JeJ03sTK13XcZOciZtNS 8weF0UsftQLipe0VgcqtlkNTArwPdGuaDQEA2NqmsMfIdPtI8P2/HHY33+Ki6EdO HlgECG/t0yzcUJkYrhnI89eZyYGQ1DpgpcG8HnXaWP+D560rY9pK0D4O71/Fjlei iZ6nYj9lDzRN/mvJfoHZBRjwFSxgJ7gTjaf+BARzepBVU2/FTXcFiLA4ZbW+wEAr 79VO2irUKfzyl5rNJvCgXD1gH57B//Zdi8Pw6cZIUgwdSnD9YG30q/uCamhYAtDA dd4Grt+/xl1qFl/hDFc3g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1659197423; x= 1659283823; bh=AgyV31CTrmdKtihH7ifR0aTHpXmvycUi80pO4tXH1QE=; b=L 6VQoCAwW1UxdeYJ0mlUKIb2ABK5d4gGea3b6SwbWDgJSrEjrff9eOB2xAw3GGrCM E4DTPF4PMYVvfp0jVwFBEoV6kzWapZl2m/N69TmjEJ7jD0fsF+RCgfjVggMAvMgW +f0ey0DsMrP+aAZuWkqqd9Oca7A7pQshWwze5bAJVruEh+3kytC6QIYFc71SnXx6 5EpMgAWVFyGBc5leLSpPR6GDRingOCI9Z7YHNK7VuWmVjX3L+4bLjpdeeYn5CYBh l5MN3pTuBAg/lRKy5cx7MZjoDM+vLp9sV4/eG6uV36InaFTHw0W3yPKMzf0SbSZn /sL4B9SVp6ba14xNCLJ4Q==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:7lflYv1J-ZI_X4LNtFByCG33syif78EP-PB0doOKK9HNk9_UGi0Hog> <xme:7lflYuHqz2-41YUCv0Hj7Jl0AcTO8rRvRPzX8iSl7oq29WXXCyKgJ8KpIMoRgCqEr _wjl4WtULKtnkwGNg>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:7lflYv5_WQVMpquoRYR8Ks2ZzQZQo66xLLTjUQdZsI9ob6yLWH7bqKztJpaqEbzh>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrvdduledgleekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfevfhfhjggtgfesth ejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomheprfgvthgvrhcuufgrihhnthdqtehnughrvgcuoehsthhp vghtvghrsehsthhpvghtvghrrdhimheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeikedtiedtff fhieetieekfeeghfelleekgeekjeefffegudeludejgeeitdfhnecuffhomhgrihhnpehg ihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehsthhpvghtvghrsehsthhpvghtvghrrdhimh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:7lflYk0fJTdgFmp6wEPyErhOJnonaqIIypP2QXipUkvzrOtElFpBBg> <xmx:7lflYiFGLbLzg_POM1U_i9DWM1X0aNnggaQ59wVzNNSFRdUrk90RcA> <xmx:7lflYl8em097RGpgdkt-RwjWOtBjyJJK5yELYxmy4JzIz-fnLZPUqA> <xmx:71flYuhOsiV6-39VOMejrDjPZsGUMpq5U_qJdsTxR3NXIBxC0j2V6Q>
Feedback-ID: i24394279:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 30 Jul 2022 12:10:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <9c9922a8-93b5-611f-6433-dbac122dcc4f@stpeter.im>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 10:10:21 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis.all@ietf.org
Cc: "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org, uta@ietf.org
References: <165728991008.45773.10659091812976572509@ietfa.amsl.com> <4c7fcbfe-5055-d33d-e1d1-27e85592551a@stpeter.im> <A0DD6035-C9D1-4FEC-A5E7-7D95FFC55602@iii.ca>
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <A0DD6035-C9D1-4FEC-A5E7-7D95FFC55602@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/lGUwCUHbgLr6whQW6bwYdYZ9wl8>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-09
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 16:10:30 -0000

On 7/30/22 9:30 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jul 14, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im 
>> <mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Given the requirements for crypto agility, I think this there should 
>>> be at
>>> least one MTI algorithm that does not rely on EC. Pinning all your 
>>> hopes on a
>>> single algorithm surely is not the best security advice the IETF can 
>>> provide.
>>> If a EC did have a problem, clearly we would want something already 
>>> build and
>>> deployed that we could switch too.
>>
>> The authors will discuss this and reply again.
> 
> I just wanted to see if there were any update on this one. I think it is 
> the most serious concern raised in my review.

I think the authors might have missed this one in our work on -10. I've 
opened a new tracking issue here:

https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/474

Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email