Re: [Uta] Proposed list of deliverables

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 03 February 2014 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710041A01E3 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:53:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J37gu1srrdVy for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64F21A01E2 for <uta@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:53:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local (unknown [24.8.129.242]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04EF040352; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:53:08 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <52EFE594.4000802@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 11:53:08 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Orit Levin (LCA)" <oritl@microsoft.com>, "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>
References: <0bc674da169f4772b0fb2173ed679115@BY2PR03MB300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <52EFD694.5010405@stpeter.im> <0b0789ddea34437fbf26e9b66cb9dcaf@BL2PR03MB290.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <0b0789ddea34437fbf26e9b66cb9dcaf@BL2PR03MB290.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Proposed list of deliverables
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:53:12 -0000

On 2/3/14, 11:41 AM, Orit Levin (LCA) wrote:

>>> 2. Applications' independent document recommending best existing
>>> and future practices for using TLS (Likely a BCP or a Proposed
>>> Standard RFC)
>>
>> I think draft-sheffer-tls-bcp is a good starting point for this
>> deliverable.
>>
>
> More specifically, section 4 of this draft "enriched" with the recent
> discussion points and recommendations from the list.

IMHO we might want to address a slightly wider range of topics, or at 
least organized the current information so it's a bit easier to find 
particular recommendations about things like certificate validation, key 
length, unauthenticated encryption, SNI, compression, session 
resumption, etc. Actually it would be good to have a list of the topics 
about which we want to have recommendations, too

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/