Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: uuidrev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uuidrev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12772C1D3DE2
	for <uuidrev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  9 Feb 2025 08:48:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
	DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001,
	RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
	SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001,
	URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001]
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
	header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194])
	by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id bGpasAqNFHWi for <uuidrev@ietfa.amsl.com>;
	Sun,  9 Feb 2025 08:48:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE193C1D3DC6
	for <uuidrev@ietf.org>; Sun,  9 Feb 2025 08:48:27 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: relay.sandelman.ca;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key;
 secure) header.d=sandelman.ca header.i=@sandelman.ca header.a=rsa-sha256
 header.s=dyas header.b=YuVnOEh1;
	dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (unknown [142.169.16.214])
	by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83EED1F4A4;
	Sun,  9 Feb 2025 16:48:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 94348A1A68; Sun,  9 Feb 2025 11:48:09 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=dyas;
	t=1739119689; bh=QbwVTM5+lyqddi1mBXGFMIYMHw83sJr4BS4T3PW1eYc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From;
	b=YuVnOEh1aJYnojha8fICH6Q1s6KqwmY74IPsJYM6QuPICRVBznc5q5Qqt6OPYI6Eo
	 UUFzHaj96SmuPYeO5pwIoSpF0aX884jV3sQP+wn5CtWKMTZf9HYOukCCf54mm7MBnY
	 s1ZvdK5vQrRBtMnHcMoxh9E+LAeQ1VCKGsvVS9hNEsXTvMtjS05jCy4B3rxjgG45eo
	 jUnoLfCokRXB4gp3Ka0/CFeg67nAsR160aT9KjLsbLnv4NFL24tlF4wcZiwFK9pAaJ
	 VwVWFj0kMdtAC0CERqR6zQfbi0Lek0yCVY/bzwUuoB/k331mQsIcrMHS+q17IjbSb/
	 7xxlR4/tOrTJA==
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90690A1A67;
	Sun,  9 Feb 2025 11:48:09 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: kydavis@cisco.com, brad@peabody.io, pjl7@uw.edu, superuser@gmail.com,
    orie@transmute.industries, fenton@bluepopcorn.net,
    nathanmcgarvey@gmail.com, uuidrev@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20250208220238.93E622199B3@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
References: <20250208220238.93E622199B3@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Comments: In-reply-to RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
   message dated "Sat, 08 Feb 2025 14:02:38 -0800."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 11:48:09 -0500
Message-ID: <1042276.1739119689@dyas>
Message-ID-Hash: Y3RTHWBUJAGRMOWE2V6MCEFEZQTCPW52
X-Message-ID-Hash: Y3RTHWBUJAGRMOWE2V6MCEFEZQTCPW52
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency;
 loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia;
 implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject;
 digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BUuidrev=5D_Re=3A_=5BTechnical_Errata_Reported=5D_RFC9562_=28828?=
	=?utf-8?q?8=29?=
List-Id: Revise Universally Unique Identifier Definitions <uuidrev.ietf.org>
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uuidrev/qMFPq-m_CpFcA9ywuxqjpZzaWgM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uuidrev>
List-Help: <mailto:uuidrev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:uuidrev-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:uuidrev@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:uuidrev-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:uuidrev-leave@ietf.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
    > 60-bit timestamp valid until 5623 AD; UUIDv7 features a 48-bit

    > Corrected Text
    > 60-bit timestamp valid until 5236 AD; UUIDv7 features a 48-bit


    > Notes
    > -----
    > I believe the error is the result of a bad calculation that used the
    > Unix epoch as the zero-date instead of the Gregorian calendar's 1582
    > zero-date. I've seen online references to the following [incorrect]

okay.
Kyzer, Brad, Paul, do you concur?

If so, tell Orie to approve the edits.

I think it's sort-of-technical, but also sort of editorial, as I don't
anticipate any of us being alive between 5236 and 5623 to deal with this problem.

It also kinda looks like a dyslexic typo, since the digits are permutted.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*




--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEERK+9HEcJHTJ9UqTMlUzhVv38QpAFAmeo3EkACgkQlUzhVv38
QpDpCwgAjqSVY8GfMNDUDcudfdcN2pjbHIaCAtWxCTxf+ANitfwUWIF7kPAvqQQt
wnaqRIK3GvfqbLF6pAi6ed1s7GIBD018ACF7Ak+5THpFPvWkIUIHGJDChptoTUzT
nTDv5KG3x4ZG5/YjLhR/9FrQv8BfkzHXr+qUFOdj7b/b+Iv7zmz3pQEd+iEGvzvR
LuScRtJJ/c3XIfvWMR5l1o3SBh4rd54AumdC4vJn+a12Yk1lStwl+bCRvq1ah/nz
BLCo4np4HojbXr4pz0Qc2cEeZe9nfuAjysAlrAp1zJEFo+P1EUPYgjK7JvECnx3c
2HDIvuaOWbmySSH3i6vr51UqEbvqJg==
=KDTk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

