Re: [v4tov6transition] [Softwires] ISP support of Native IPv6 across NAT44 CPEs - Proposed 6a44 Specification

Ole Troan <> Wed, 06 October 2010 06:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDB33A70E0; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.576
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JayH97DrB9sn; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D8B3A70E5; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 23:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so3616757eyd.31 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=iwUXuHxCDIGWUzmZWnANHtTpzj7u16wieVMjrWJu0Qo=; b=QHPZrAaQ7d08O2KmhRyc8jO3ElsmgSUbRcoaQ6aqKc9dp91lDbg9IKg/xiv6Ky2XTe cMsBX8QP2M2FSl52m5Gz6r9oufs/sr4s8CJfqvQvJrj7c452kngguoivKVBz/NIEIzX3 5PhoSAPrULWUijorbl3sKyMWqATcc3CUxCuHU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=gamma; h=sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=i8szBtmyLZCsYhmAoe/tCNd28aTEkAEWACg+Zu76CiKkCxtD/APzeDpIXgq665o1GR /W+iWMs18ZEepZOOevElhg5exKcGH3F1MI4EWjpH0jZltu9St8rNLaaZjzR9PSIH37Nu AvPDQeCWN9uMtpMs8XisdKUCuIH7/AKbplfKw=
Received: by with SMTP id b14mr9209383ebi.33.1286348261416; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:57:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by with ESMTPS id z55sm932796eeh.21.2010. (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Ole Troan <>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Ole Troan <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 08:57:35 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <>
To: Brian E Carpenter <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Cc: Softwires <>,
Subject: Re: [v4tov6transition] [Softwires] ISP support of Native IPv6 across NAT44 CPEs - Proposed 6a44 Specification
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:56:44 -0000


>> Draft-despres-softwire-6a44-00, coauthored with Brian and Sheng, has just been posted (
>> It describes a solution for ISPs to offer native IPv6 across IPv4-only CPEs (NAT44 CPEs).
>> It results from convergence discussion between authors of draft-carpenter-6man-sample-00 and draft-despres-softwire-6rdplus-00, taking into account comments made by authors of draft-lee-softwire-6rd-udp-01, and those made other Softwire WG participants since IETF 78.
>> It is submitted to become, after discussion in the WG, a Softwire I-D.
> By the way, we do discuss in the draft why it's a useful alternative to
> both tunnel brokers (such as Hexago and SixXs) or Teredo. We don't
> explicitly discuss why we think it's also a useful alternative to an L2TP
> solution, but the arguments are, I think, similar to those for the tunnel
> brokers (apart from our "hobbyist" comment).

perhaps you could also add some deployment considerations with regards to host tunneling versus "network" tunneling?