Re: [v4tov6transition] [Softwires] ISP support of Native IPv6 across NAT44 CPEs - Proposed 6a44 Specification

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 05 October 2010 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4tov6transition@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2E33A6FDE; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 13:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.604
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dJGkGrAugcsX; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 13:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1C63A6E35; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 13:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so4761436fxm.31 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0oN6LxLQxkLVs+gtvYIQKAOWa1TMCbGRoNG3eDjGpH4=; b=G7Ra528lc8T9UZ29d/9vz9FJOp4/zFRTsA51ZBhH0msjVO8VdTtj/y/UjUy8Yq0bSI 7wxesybjczEMeCnFrOBjyXm8M8q54LWUCtWY5XUTJaM2YJg1QPZemi0Qs99MyMNgXm6G 2uQu6vLUA/sMdLaFORIEIWcQJsBIuZq+/zw/g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=CF63eTCJo5KP5WxOMKRjVQMwwgResyxgbOAWdoenaN9vTrOe8LhmjqrdzdHA/pT981 m6c06AxOf3s7FtD1s4bEM0FlzT0+T2tY4AsFmVCjl46rpRe4Bttm8u3BE0IOWnHi0mWM 7jg8Vmk+eLJiCVHY7UxXX1MGDSxxe4DH2dlOk=
Received: by 10.223.126.11 with SMTP id a11mr11476997fas.25.1286311838485; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.216.38.124] (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r8sm3198000faq.34.2010.10.05.13.50.34 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4CAB8F97.90501@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:50:31 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Softwires <softwires@ietf.org>
References: <31672657-0CCB-4C2B-B44A-AEE73B588960@free.fr>
In-Reply-To: <31672657-0CCB-4C2B-B44A-AEE73B588960@free.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: v4tov6transition@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v4tov6transition] [Softwires] ISP support of Native IPv6 across NAT44 CPEs - Proposed 6a44 Specification
X-BeenThere: v4tov6transition@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <v4tov6transition.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition>, <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v4tov6transition>
List-Post: <mailto:v4tov6transition@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4tov6transition>, <mailto:v4tov6transition-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:49:42 -0000

On 2010-10-05 22:26, Rémi Després wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Draft-despres-softwire-6a44-00, coauthored with Brian and Sheng, has just been posted (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-despres-softwire-6a44-00).
> It describes a solution for ISPs to offer native IPv6 across IPv4-only CPEs (NAT44 CPEs).
> 
> It results from convergence discussion between authors of draft-carpenter-6man-sample-00 and draft-despres-softwire-6rdplus-00, taking into account comments made by authors of draft-lee-softwire-6rd-udp-01, and those made other Softwire WG participants since IETF 78.
> 
> It is submitted to become, after discussion in the WG, a Softwire I-D.

By the way, we do discuss in the draft why it's a useful alternative to
both tunnel brokers (such as Hexago and SixXs) or Teredo. We don't
explicitly discuss why we think it's also a useful alternative to an L2TP
solution, but the arguments are, I think, similar to those for the tunnel
brokers (apart from our "hobbyist" comment).

    Brian