IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v4v6interim] Fragmentation Options in NAT6 presentation

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> Tue, 14 October 2008 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C252E3A6ACB; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879ED3A6827 for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:15:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.873
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.873 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.726, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LvY2VzTFe7We for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653DE3A6ACB for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,408,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="22535476"
Received: from ams-dkim-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.138]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Oct 2008 09:15:46 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m9E9FkVU002941; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:15:46 +0200
Received: from xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-332.cisco.com [144.254.231.87]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9E9Fk9R002557; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:15:46 GMT
Received: from xmb-ams-33a.cisco.com ([144.254.231.85]) by xbh-ams-332.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:15:46 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:16:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CE2BF2A7B1008C459FD7978065C6ECE007A590BF@xmb-ams-33a.emea.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <76C0A264-F6C3-42B1-A6DC-A52B5B3AF56A@muada.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [v4v6interim] Fragmentation Options in NAT6 presentation
Thread-Index: Ackt3CeSaOqjzbaZRSq/8/zHw2bGdgAATmfQ
References: <B2FE551A-5BA9-4D46-B619-EF694015D5AF@tahi.org> <BB56240F3A190F469C52A57138047A03011DB1F0@xmb-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com> <CE2BF2A7B1008C459FD7978065C6ECE007949456@xmb-ams-33a.emea.cisco.com> <76C0A264-F6C3-42B1-A6DC-A52B5B3AF56A@muada.com>
From: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2008 09:15:46.0674 (UTC) FILETIME=[712FA520:01C92DDD]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=449; t=1223975746; x=1224839746; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=evyncke@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Eric=20Vyncke=20(evyncke)=22=20<evyncke@cisco.c om> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[v4v6interim]=20Fragmentation=20Options =20in=20NAT6=20presentation |Sender:=20; bh=mgqwPDM9DxQnAOYMp237X9em0XeZS1O4ZIxMgtxOiVU=; b=sznG0jy/f9d+woVEhbLEPs9s7Vn+JwpCFJDfo4IEs4/LQuVtqARX4sumHG DA/z26/N7Oyy5NcVRRDq/UYKmr7tl5msrkob9zRIqAwtZsI/6Eki62vBYQtw ++jgWBGRSi;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=evyncke@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] Fragmentation Options in NAT6 presentation
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org

> 
> > Hence the importance of setting 'manually' the MTU right at 
> the edge 
> > where the ICMP generation rate is probably (?) lower than 
> in the core.
> 
> You mean using large MTUs in the middle. Then you don't have 
> trouble.  
> Using small MTUs in the middle isn't a good idea.

Actually, I mean two things (which have the same cause & effect):
- try to avoid small MTU in the core
- generate ICMP at the edge
_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status