Re: [v4v6interim] BOF discussions

What I'm suggesting is that the folks that need to discuss translation  
- perhaps 15 of us total - sit down and talk about it, and the same  
opportunity be available to the tunneling folks. My point is to foment  
accomplishment; as Randy says, he needs this yesterday. I have no  
problem with other discussions happening too and expect still to have  
a requirements discussion in v6ops.

On Oct 2, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:

> Fred,
>
> Good suggestion.  However, what if a BOF is needed to discuss a  
> solution
> where both xlat and tunnel are needed?  Do we discuss those in this WG
> mailer or spawn a 3rd new BOF mailer?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Hemant
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org 
> ]
> On Behalf Of Fred Baker (fred)
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 5:14 PM
> To: v4v6interim@ietf.org
> Subject: [v4v6interim] BOF discussions
>
> So various folks are going to be doing a lot of work in email and such
> in the next few weeks. May I suggest that the ADs schedule a BOF for  
> the
> translation solution and one for the tunneling solution (and one for  
> the
> 4-4-4 solution?) separate from WGs, to enable the doc authors to sit
> down together and discuss?
>
> I would also suggest that you set of mailing lists for these BOFs,
> perhaps called v4v6-xlat and v4v6-tunnel or some such. Announce them  
> to
> this forum and let people sign up the usual way.
> _______________________________________________
> v4v6interim mailing list
> v4v6interim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim

_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim