Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in the agenda?

Fair enough and thanks to everyone for the feedback.

I was more looking at the feasibility of the experiment and its content.
If people think writing up a short draft outlining the goals and the
experiment itself is a good idea, I appreciate your feedback and
specific ideas. We can also talk about this informally in Montreal.

Andrei

Rémi Després wrote on 29-09-2008 16:54:
> Although the subject is clearly important, I am concerned that it might
> end up taking too much time in a meeting that has already a lot urgent
> matter to deal with.
> 
> I therefore support that its discussion be left for Minneapolis.
>
> RD
> 
> 
> Margaret Wasserman   (m/j/a) 9/29/08 4:19 PM:
>>
>> I don't think it is a good idea to add this to the interim agenda for
>> several reasons:
>>
>> (1) This isn't really a small topic.  Previous discussions of this
>> issue have involved strongly held opinions on both sides, and it is
>> unlikely that this could be resolved quickly.
>>
>> (2) This topic isn't specific to v4v6 transition.  Some people who are
>> interested in this topic may not be at the interim meeting, and
>> probably wouldn't know that this was going to be discussed there.
>>
>> (3) It doesn't seem that this topic is so urgent that it couldn't wait
>> until the next IETF meeting in Minneapolis, where it could be
>> discussed in a more open forum.
>>
>> So, I'd recommend against adding it here.
>>
>> Margaret
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim