Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg!
Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Mon, 13 October 2008 12:41 UTC
Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A7E3A698E; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210D73A6841 for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RoHGqHPnPbi1 for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDB2F3A6883 for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:720:410:1001:21b:63ff:fe92:9fbb] ([IPv6:2001:720:410:1001:21b:63ff:fe92:9fbb]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m9DCg0h0033140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:42:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <290F8ED4-F51C-429F-9DD6-F904996A1CED@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7E414550-E1C7-46BB-A7AD-D4F128903046@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:42:16 +0200
References: <732E532B-97C7-465C-BBE0-FD1B442DB21E@muada.com> <7E414550-E1C7-46BB-A7AD-D4F128903046@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg!
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
On 7 okt 2008, at 19:26, Fred Baker wrote: > What does it mean to be "IPv6-like"? That everything happens mostly automatic and is easy otherwise. For instance, in IPv4 you have to think about how big each subnet is. In IPv6 you don't. > The one point of disagreement that I have had with Marcello's > Pref64::/96 characterization is that it does something that RFC 4291 > says to not do. If we have a prefix whose left-most bits are not > 000, we are supposed to reserve the right-most 64 bits for host > identifier Yes, I know. What I don't know is why this text was put in the RFC, so far nobody has been able (or willing) to tell me that. > As such, neglecting the question of using the 0::ffff:a.b.c.d, > 0::0:a.b.c.d, or 0::ffff:0:a.b.c.d forms, if I have a prefix > assigned by the network operator, the address architecture says that > I would have to treat all Pref64::a.b.c.d routes as host routes. > Tell me that this is not what you're hoping for in an IPv6 address? Not entirely sure what you're trying to say. But obviously we can specify the behavior that we want in a new specification so I don't know why it would matter. > What CERNET has done is define an address that maps to RFC 4291's > architecture, allows them to (within that architecture) subnet IPv4- > mapped addresses in the IPv6 domain, and use the mapping effectively > in routing. If there is anything that I would hope was IPv6-like, it > would have those characteristics. > All you do is crab; you don't like it, but you don't give a > technical reason to not like it. What's your point? The IVI mapping means that at the very least a special subnet has to be created for every IPv4-reachable host. The suggestion of having non-/64 subnets and DHCPv6 is very problematic because DHCPv6 doesn't know about subnet prefix lengths. The situation where a static mapping is set up means that the configuration can be limited to the translation box, this simply makes much more sense on every level. _______________________________________________ v4v6interim mailing list v4v6interim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim
- [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Fred Baker
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Rémi Després
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Turchanyi Geza
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Rémi Després
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Randy Bush
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Dan Wing
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Lars Eggert
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Lars Eggert
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Lars Eggert
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Dan Wing
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Dan Wing
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Lars Eggert
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Fred Baker
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Fred Baker
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Ralph Droms
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! TJ
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Fred Baker
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Iljitsch van Beijnum