Re: [v4v6interim] [BEHAVE] [46translation] Proposal for new BEHAVEcharter

Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com> Thu, 23 October 2008 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6BE28C0FC; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5603A6AA8; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNrnlscjdJGY; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F803A6AB2; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,471,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="23556265"
Received: from ams-dkim-2.cisco.com ([144.254.224.139]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2008 17:49:43 +0000
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com (ams-core-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.150]) by ams-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m9NHnhbp016716; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:49:43 +0200
Received: from xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com (xbh-ams-331.cisco.com [144.254.231.71]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9NHhZPW010352; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:49:43 GMT
Received: from xfe-ams-331.emea.cisco.com ([144.254.231.72]) by xbh-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:49:11 +0200
Received: from ams-townsley-8711.cisco.com ([10.55.233.226]) by xfe-ams-331.emea.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:49:11 +0200
Message-ID: <4900B914.1050908@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:49:08 +0200
From: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
References: <48F8539D.90608@ericsson.com> <48FB9C5E.8070402@gmail.com> <3E041E8D-8539-4A16-9188-86A1DCEEE62B@muada.com> <200810201358.29295.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> <8E5328A8-4937-41A8-A650-204795E074D1@muada.com> <5B78195C-1318-4325-8F98-BC19F59E1532@cisco.com> <01462145-8E18-465A-8989-D1C98D421DED@muada.com> <B5A2E7E1-7FAE-48B6-85E2-B1300DF1458D@cisco.com> <9E0384AB-A20B-44E7-8575-9275101FF920@muada.com><49008B8E.9080408@ericsson.com> <49008F1E.3010804@cisco.com> <EE6DCD77-43B9-40A8-B0BC-FAE79B3D8B49@lilacglade.org> <031d01c93535$c85b1140$9d6d6b80@cisco.com> <4C1AFFD1-34DF-4DDE-A081-09C652A63CF4@lilacglade.org> <036801c93537$5dc254e0$9d6d6b80@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <036801c93537$5dc254e0$9d6d6b80@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2008 17:49:11.0373 (UTC) FILETIME=[A7EF6FD0:01C93537]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=969; t=1224784183; x=1225648183; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=townsley@cisco.com; z=From:=20Mark=20Townsley=20<townsley@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[BEHAVE]=20[v4v6interim]=20[46translati on]=20Proposal=20for=20new=20BEHAVEcharter |Sender:=20; bh=2vJIkwNYJhDZ+OKDhUy1700XBKbjH3qFmVjchnN+lUc=; b=KImWNNiyPG2L2SlEZo+xWJpWzynYjTCDszw0iaw4iB/Rgqu68fTrDPVTHR /0yWwAsZQTm87Ls6laLpQvbrPZRygoqSt176ei7Y1x4ee0gYvxwosCffGagh L7Jlc8kJNY;
Authentication-Results: ams-dkim-2; header.From=townsley@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org, '46Translation' <46translation@employees.org>, 'Behave WG' <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] [BEHAVE] [46translation] Proposal for new BEHAVEcharter
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org

Dan Wing wrote:
>> On Oct 23, 2008, at 1:35 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
>>     
>>> BEHAVE is being re-chartered, so if the community wants BEHAVE to
>>> do NAT66, now is a good time to tell the IESG to include NAT66 in
>>> BEHAVE's charter.  (as you all know.)  The new charter, at this
>>> time, does not include NAT66.
>>>
>>> And I only stated my desire to avoid the 'third rail'; the IESG can
>>> certainly decide they want NAT66 standardized.  Based on my
>>> understanding of how NAT66 would work, it would belong in BEHAVE.
>>>       
>> Thanks, Dan.  This is very reasonable.
>>
>> So, what's the best way forward?  Perhaps I could write a 
>> draft, sent  
>> a pointer to behave, and we could have a discussion over the next  
>> couple of weeks about whether the community does/doesn't want to  
>> include this in the new behave charter?
>>     
>
> Yes, that would be ideal.  Thanks!
>   
Works for me as well.

- Mark
> -d
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim