IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v4v6interim] [46translation] [BEHAVE] Proposal for new BEHAVE charter

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Fri, 24 October 2008 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D353A69B2; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04223A69D4; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 435+4jWZEQMK; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:1af8:2:5::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5503A6974; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:50:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nirrti.it.uc3m.es (nirrti.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m9OBpgR6081617 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:51:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Message-Id: <372F2903-0116-45EF-87B0-304270667BBB@muada.com>
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
To: "\"Rémi Denis-Courmont\"" <remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <200810241444.06688.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:51:58 +0200
References: <48F8539D.90608@ericsson.com> <200810241309.55912.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> <E1F09AB5-F343-4634-8CE9-B1C6CA92A261@muada.com> <200810241444.06688.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org, 46Translation <46translation@employees.org>, behave@ietf.org, ext Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] [46translation] [BEHAVE] Proposal for new BEHAVE charter
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org

On 24 okt 2008, at 13:44, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:

> NAT44 provide N:1 internal:external address mappings, not N:M. With  
> N:M you
> will break applications that _do_ work with NAT44, including a very  
> long tail
> of HTTP-based applications. Making NAT66 worse than NAT44 is  
> unlikely to fly,
> even with those people who _do_ want to deploy NAT66.

If the load balancers ignore the bottom 64 bits there is no issue.

So I suggest we tell those vendors to do exactly that when they build  
the IPv6 implementations of their products.
_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email