Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg!
"Turchanyi Geza" <turchanyi.geza@gmail.com> Fri, 10 October 2008 07:08 UTC
Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746A93A6AA5; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C783A6800 for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:08:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lSlaZ73q5nP8 for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2AE3A67D8 for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id q7so1062678uge.15 for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=QJSF93ZcU9qNoC5oW5gtlZnj+ou17ulSTeDndxhDeAc=; b=BN/hhOnXUewNorfdslRCzBQXrlwNRngcpuhl/2AlBTcr4F0oL7vJ5psO/TTPFPjHue HEk6R0DHOzLC/7mb23aItJprtk5mPAKVRdWDu+Hb66Q+PfYbMSVpqgUss1gKjJi0at3g 8nQ0F4ABXSocQVnuhwk8DytFChwLDQCgQBlJ8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=i4xWnSnFhLLO4OtAqk3SqCbUGRbSdf47gCnGroQpDGDTFTdL1n8E0Lv9n+3W1Kb5JQ EhWzOylQqibriJ87TNpEa8h+zftZd2OkP54eseZTWIc5TXly8pFMldh0weTCUgL7JGks iltw9F7R6CH09cqUhQVFvU/qNqyPf0XvB3THc=
Received: by 10.103.241.5 with SMTP id t5mr771384mur.72.1223622545251; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.249.10 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f1110c510810100009r51bf3553n999ef0489f4dff03@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:09:05 +0200
From: Turchanyi Geza <turchanyi.geza@gmail.com>
To: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>
In-Reply-To: <48EC5D76.5080109@free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <732E532B-97C7-465C-BBE0-FD1B442DB21E@muada.com> <48EC5D76.5080109@free.fr>
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg!
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Hello, Well, SAM is an interesting idea. HOWEVER: if we can implement new software (almost)everywhere, than why not to use IPv6 everywhere? I missed the point: what can be kept unchanged in the SAM scenario? Thanks, Geza On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr> wrote: > Iljitsch van Beijnum (m/j/a) 10/7/08 3:46 PM: >> >> >> http://digg.com/tech_news/IETF_working_on_making_IPv6_and_IPv4_talk_to_each_other > > Very clear article, and very nice reading :-). > > It would have been more accurate, though, if the A+P and SAM approaches > would at least have been listed. (Having NAT64, DS Lite and IVI as the > complete list of solutions discussed "to make the IPv4 world talk to the > (future) IPv6 world" is missing something.) > > Worth being remembered: SAM has more potential than other solutions for > IPv4-only clients to reach an IPv6 capable server that only has a shared > IPv4 address (with a restricted port range, accessible via tunnels). > > In particular, in draft-despres-SAM-v4v6coexistenceScenarios-00, > scenario C is as follows (simplified to have encapsulation in IPv6 only, > and complemented to show on it supports connections both ways). > > > > +------+ +--------+ Global > | SAM | +---------+ | SAM | Internet > | host |--site v6--| SAM CPE |-- ISP v6 ----| ISP GW |<--- v4 --> > +------+ +---------+ +--------+ > > SAM <--- v4/v6 -->SAM1 SAM2<---- v4/v6 ---> SAM <----- v4 ----> > : : : > '- Port restricted '- Stateless CPE '--- Stateless GW > socket interface > > > <---- transparency to global v4 packets -----> > (outgoing AND incoming connections) > > > Regards, > > RD > > > _______________________________________________ > v4v6interim mailing list > v4v6interim@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim > _______________________________________________ v4v6interim mailing list v4v6interim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim
- [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Fred Baker
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Rémi Després
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Turchanyi Geza
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Rémi Després
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Randy Bush
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Dan Wing
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Lars Eggert
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Lars Eggert
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Lars Eggert
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Dan Wing
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Dan Wing
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Lars Eggert
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Fred Baker
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Fred Baker
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Hemant Singh (shemant)
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Ralph Droms
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! TJ
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Fred Baker
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v4v6interim] You have been dugg! Iljitsch van Beijnum