Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in the agenda?
Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr> Mon, 29 September 2008 14:56 UTC
Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E0B3A69F0; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1BE3A69F0 for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.465, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jh82i4M8OYPb for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772F43A67A5 for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F033EA10A; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:55:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ordinateur-de-remi-despres.local (per92-10-88-166-221-144.fbx.proxad.net [88.166.221.144]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CAE3EA16A; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:55:45 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <48E0EC25.6060907@free.fr>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:54:29 +0200
From: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Macintosh/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org>
References: <48E086C5.7040004@ripe.net> <C9ADABD1-868E-469C-9615-EFF59F6C4F8A@lilacglade.org>
In-Reply-To: <C9ADABD1-868E-469C-9615-EFF59F6C4F8A@lilacglade.org>
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in the agenda?
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Although the subject is clearly important, I am concerned that it might end up taking too much time in a meeting that has already a lot urgent matter to deal with. I therefore support that its discussion be left for Minneapolis. RD Margaret Wasserman (m/j/a) 9/29/08 4:19 PM: > > I don't think it is a good idea to add this to the interim agenda for > several reasons: > > (1) This isn't really a small topic. Previous discussions of this issue > have involved strongly held opinions on both sides, and it is unlikely > that this could be resolved quickly. > > (2) This topic isn't specific to v4v6 transition. Some people who are > interested in this topic may not be at the interim meeting, and probably > wouldn't know that this was going to be discussed there. > > (3) It doesn't seem that this topic is so urgent that it couldn't wait > until the next IETF meeting in Minneapolis, where it could be discussed > in a more open forum. > > So, I'd recommend against adding it here. > > Margaret _______________________________________________ v4v6interim mailing list v4v6interim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim
- [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in the … Andrei Robachevsky
- Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in … Turchanyi Geza
- Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in … Rémi Denis-Courmont
- Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in … Geoff Huston
- Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in … Rémi Denis-Courmont
- Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in … teemu.savolainen
- Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in … Mark Townsley
- Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in … Alain Durand
- Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in … Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in … Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in … Rémi Després
- Re: [v4v6interim] Can we squeeze a tiny topic in … Andrei Robachevsky
- [v4v6interim] SP Private space [Re: Can we squeez… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v4v6interim] SP Private space [Re: Can we sq… Hiroshi MIYATA