IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v4v6interim] [BEHAVE] [46translation] Proposal for new BEHAVE charter

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 23 October 2008 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC11628C111; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:37:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4143A686E; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LlWmmzyZRM0U; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:37:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ind-iport-1.cisco.com (ind-iport-1.cisco.com [64.104.129.195]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FC43A67A3; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:37:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,472,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="31673729"
Received: from hkg-dkim-2.cisco.com ([10.75.231.163]) by ind-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Oct 2008 21:38:53 +0000
Received: from hkg-core-1.cisco.com (hkg-core-1.cisco.com [64.104.123.94]) by hkg-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m9NLcqkn032286; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:38:52 +0800
Received: from xbh-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com (xbh-hkg-411.cisco.com [64.104.123.72]) by hkg-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9NLcqI2001726; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:38:52 GMT
Received: from xfe-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com ([64.104.123.70]) by xbh-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:38:52 +0800
Received: from [192.168.100.101] ([10.75.234.250]) by xfe-hkg-411.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:38:51 +0800
Message-Id: <C78E443E-054A-4F0C-B6D0-C8D7DDE34B47@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: Mark Townsley <townsley@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <49008F1E.3010804@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:38:51 +0800
References: <48F8539D.90608@ericsson.com> <48FB9C5E.8070402@gmail.com> <3E041E8D-8539-4A16-9188-86A1DCEEE62B@muada.com> <200810201358.29295.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> <8E5328A8-4937-41A8-A650-204795E074D1@muada.com> <5B78195C-1318-4325-8F98-BC19F59E1532@cisco.com> <01462145-8E18-465A-8989-D1C98D421DED@muada.com> <B5A2E7E1-7FAE-48B6-85E2-B1300DF1458D@cisco.com> <9E0384AB-A20B-44E7-8575-9275101FF920@muada.com> <49008B8E.9080408@ericsson.com> <49008F1E.3010804@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2008 21:38:51.0811 (UTC) FILETIME=[BDB76730:01C93557]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=734; t=1224797932; x=1225661932; c=relaxed/simple; s=hkgdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[v4v6interim]=20[BEHAVE]=20[46translati on]=20Proposal=20for=20new=20BEHAVE=20charter |Sender:=20; bh=+aZROEPC7gKWO+WNFqiRpxUBJvARsbqWyJtAtI0I4oU=; b=L3S5I13kMUScRDFNVRorjZG8XwxI4IipZl2YwfZdavJA8R0V9lYA0bqenm L8kp2sXB8fH7AAu6KMdgAAvk/W/D8HWCYKxS3HrSuCN6TXkAy4/w/rMut0LG af5QR/scpPDzLnAarm/AtyqBIpkXs/JC8HSqx4iBgH/v5A3P73Fek=;
Authentication-Results: hkg-dkim-2; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/hkgdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org, 46Translation <46translation@employees.org>, Behave WG <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] [BEHAVE] [46translation] Proposal for new BEHAVE charter
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org

On Oct 23, 2008, at 10:50 PM, Mark Townsley wrote:

> The NAT66 should be relatively straightforward, and could actually  
> help highlight some of the reasons why 46 and 64 become problematic.  
> NAT66 is a question that comes up again and again when talking about  
> deploying IPv6, and I honestly think it would be useful to have a  
> document to point to that brought light to and articulated some of  
> the issues, gave strong warning where necessary, and described what  
> was relatively safe and what not.
>
> It doesn't really have to be part of behave though.

I actually think i should be in behave; they have the expertise. But I  
would agree with Magnus that it is a next step, not the current step.
_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email